- Remember, fireworks are dangerous
- Wallace asks citizens to fight cuts
- Dispute over state payroll rolls on
- Why fight over free trade confounds partisan divide
- Still no state budget
- Crime control is not the responsibility of landlords
- Fly over to the Poplar Grove Wings and Wheels Museum benefit
- Local leaders warn of budget deadlock’s impact
- SHUTDOWN: Illinois preps for the worst
- TRRT Online Edition | July 1-7
Editorial: Ethanol plant about much more than air quality
Like the proposed hog slaughtering facility controversy of 2004, we will be hearing much more about air quality issues associated with a possible ethanol plant in Winnebago County near Park-Er-Woods subdivision on Rockfords far west side. However, for me, the controversy extends well beyond air and quality-of-life issues.
The debate should not only be about those important topics, but also our needless over-reliance on fossil fuels for energy, fuel crops versus food crops, carbon dioxide emissions.
For those who are unfamiliar with the topic, let me describe the background.
Illinois farmers are one of the largest producers of corn in the nation. That corn an be processed into many products, such as ethanol, which is the type of alcohol found in beer, wine, distilled spirits and gasoline.
Supporters of ethanol in gasoline claim it helps the fossil-fuel burn more cleanly and decreases our reliance on imported oil used to produce gasoline. They also claim ethanol in gasoline provides a needed market for Illinois corn farmers to sell their product.
The beneficiaries of the proposed ethanol facility will likely be corporate and independent farmers and agri-businesses that process corn into ethanol. Supporters of the plant also assert the facility will provide more opportunities for local jobs.
Opponents of the plant, which include nearby residents, say the primary argument against the facility is that it will significantly decrease air quality, which may result in health and safety hazards and a decrease in quality-of-life.
As important as those arguments are, in my opinion, ethanol for use in gasoline is a ruse as even a partial answer to our over-reliance on fossil-based fuel for motor vehicles. This is because it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than the energy that is derived from the corn.
That fact results in a net contribution to global carbon dioxide emission levels that exacerbates global warming. Ethanol from corn also results in undue stress on the land through depletion of nutrients and minerals in the soil, which are needed to grow food crops rather than fuel crops.
Lets hope our local daily newspaper, politicians and business leaders dont privately or publicly display a familiar cavalier attitude toward residents concerns about the proposed ethanol facility by calling them NIMBYs (Not In My Back Yard) or CAVE (Citizens Against Virtually Everything) people.
A healthy skepticism is necessary to keep democracy.
from the Jan. 11-17, 2006, issue