Source: Purdue University
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind.The genetic modifications that improve animals for human consumption also could doom populations if released into the wild, according to a Purdue University research team.
Biologist Rick Howard and his colleagues have discovered a paradox that crops up when new genes are deliberately inserted into a fishs chromosomes to make the animal grow larger. While the genetically modified fish will be bigger and have more success at attracting mates, they may also produce offspring that are less likely to survive to adulthood. If this occurs, as generations pass, a population could dwindle in size and, potentially, disappear entirely.
Ours is the first demonstration that a genetically modified organism has a reproductive advantage over its natural counterpart, said Howard, a professor of biological sciences in Purdues School of Science. Though altering animals genes can be good for humans in the short run, it may prove catastrophic for nature in the long run if not done with care. And we dont know just what kind of care is necessary yet, or how much.
This research, which Howard conducted with William Muir of the Animal Sciences Department and Andrew DeWoody of the Forestry and Natural Resources Department, appeared in the Feb. 17 online issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Howard and Muir published a related article in the same journal in December 1999 that showed larger animals had a mating advantage, but their previous article did not relate mating advantage to genetic modification.
The most common question posed about genetically modified organismsGMOs for short, and also called transgenicsis whether they are safe for people to eat. When GMOs were first made commercially available in 1996, many food crops, such as corn and soybeans, were altered to produce substantially more yield than they do in nature. The debate on GMOs in supermarkets has not yet been resolved, and Howard said it could be drawing attention from an equally important issue: whether GMOs are safe for the planet.
With all the concern over whether transgenic food is safe for humans, the environment has been more or less left out of the picture, Howard said. Plenty of laboratories are studying whether GMOs are safe for human consumption, but to my knowledge, ours is the only one that looks at whether they will be safe for the Earth.
As a step toward resolving this issue, Howard and his colleagues set out to examine the risk transgenic fish might pose to natural-bred populations. They chose to examine the Japanese medaka, a small fish that breeds daily, because it would reproduce often enough for trends to emerge relatively quickly.
We took several tanks and put a female into each one with two malesone natural, and one transgenic, Howard said. The transgenic males were 83 percent heavier than the natural-bred males, so it was easy to distinguish which male was mating with the female.
Howard found that the larger transgenic males mated three times for every time the natural-bred males didnot surprising, considering the premium that female medakas place on male size. But though the transgenic males mated more often, fewer of their young survived to adulthood.
What surprised us was how fast a GMO mating advantage could cause a transgene to spread in a population, Howard said. Additionally, we were intrigued at the outcome predicted if this advantage was combined with the disadvantage of young with reduced survival ability.
Howard observed that for every 100 offspring sired by a natural male that survived to adulthood, only 70 of the young produced by a transgenic male survived.
Putting both of these things together, a population invaded by a few genetically modified individuals would become more and more transgenic, and as it did, the population would get smaller and smaller, he said. We call this the Trojan gene effect.
Over time, continued Howard, this effect could continue to multiply itself over generations, eventually decimating a population.
Imagine a pie, and you eat 30 percent of it every day, he said. Half of it is gone in two days, and within a week less than one-tenth of it remains. It is conceivable that a similar effect could occur among fish populations if GMOs with Trojan genes escape into the wild.
Though the reports conclusions are sobering, Howard cautions that the groups research is based on computer models as well as observation of actual fish mating behaviorbehavior that took place within a controlled laboratory setting rather than in nature, where other factors could influence the outcome. Consequently, these ideas should not be taken as gospel under all circumstances.
We were aiming to detect the potential risk a GMO might pose to the environment, he said. The protocols our group developed with this report could be used as a tool for agencies and food producers for that purpose.
This research has been funded in part by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.