Viewpoint: Patriotism or petrification?
Viewpoint: Patriotism or petrification?
By Joe Baker
Patriotism or petrification?
By Joe Baker
Jingoism has taken hold in a segment of the American media, and objectivity, critical thinking and investigative reporting are in danger.
Joan Konner, a professor at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism in New York, writing in Newsday, proclaimed:
A curtain of prescribed patriotism has dropped over our TV news screens, obscuring all but the most ratings-driven stories. …Even the barely readable and often dissonant crawl of other news across the bottom of our screens is not reporting whats going on backstage of the red-white-and-blue curtain of war and national security.
Indeed the curtain of perverted, belligerent patriotism is obscuring many
Continued on page 4
From page 1
disturbing developments in our country. The effect of this myopia is perhaps felt initially by the alternative media or anyone who dares to think out loud about whats going on.
Remember the absolutist Love it or leave it mantra from the Vietnam fiasco?
Witness the belligerent stance of the Media Research Center, which claims to be a conservative media watchdog. We are training our guns, says the Center, on any media outlet or reporter interfering with Americas war on terrorism or (trying) to undermine President Bush.
What sort of research is this? It certainly stinks of fascism. Konner reports the presidents of CBS and ABC already have gotten a case of the shakes from the baleful glare of Media Research. If Joe McCarthy could grin, he would be smiling ear to ear.
While the media indulge in covering the butter-fingered hunt for Osama bin Laden and other distractions, a number of serious issues are going begging. There is no serious analysis of Bush policies and practices.
As we have said before, there are dozens of questions surrounding the WTC attacks that are going unanswered. For that matter, there are still many unanswered questions about the bombing in Oklahoma City. The governments pat explanations do not satisfy these queries, yet legislation has emerged from these two national tragedies that has done the most damage to civil rights, privacy rightsthe Bill of Rightsin American history.
Few, if any, are looking into the $40 billion rip-off of Social Security to finance our flattening of Afghanistan and other adventures.
Who is probing the so-called economic stimulus that is nothing more than expanded corporate welfare and rewarding the very wealthy?
What about the secret energy policy, the decades major strawmancampaign finance reformhealth care and looming deficits at the state and federal levels? There are also the first signs of serious cracks in the international banking system, beginning with Argentina and Japan.
Much of the American public has locked into Bushs declaration that either youre with us, or youre with the terrorists. It implies that anyone who disagrees with Dubyas policies is somehow un-American and un-patriotic.
Dissent is at the heart of true patriotism. It gave birth to this republic. Even in those days, the truth went through the stages described by Schopenauer. First, anyone against the king was ridiculed. Next, there was violent opposition (the Revolution) and finally, it was accepted as self-evident; freedom was better than servitude.
Bushs statement raises the question who are the terrorists? There is yet no credible hard evidence that bin Laden masterminded the attacks. We have been offered only the governments obviously bogus tape which has been lampooned even among our allies.
There is also the matter of the death of John ONeill.
ONeill was the former deputy director of the FBI. Two weeks before the WTC attack, he left his job with the bureau and became head of security at the twin towers. ONeill had been actively investigating bin Laden and terrorism. He quit the FBI because he was disgusted with what he believed was obstructionism of his efforts by the Bush administration.
ONeill was quoted in Bin Laden: The Forbidden Truth, a controversial new book by French intelligence analysts Charles Brissard and Guillaume Dasquie. The authors said he told them: The main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests, and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it.
ONeill was bitter over his belief that the U.S. State Department and the oil lobby making up the presidents entourage had blocked his every effort to establish bin Ladens guilt.
The book charges, based on ONeills statements and other evidence, that the Bush administration impeded the investigation of bin Laden and al-Qaeda while dealing with the Taliban for construction of an oil pipeline across Afghanistan.
Was John ONeill the man who knew too much, or was his death coincidence?
Against this sordid backdrop, we have the spectacle of exploitation of the aftermath of Sept. 11. Ground Zero has been converted to a profit-making tourist attraction! We sell tickets to visit the site and offer tasteless souvenirs. Movie stars and other celebrities are given police escorts there so they can stare as if seeing the face of evil. What more gross way of dishonoring and disrespecting the dead could be imagined?
Then there is the looming cataclysm of the Enron debacle. The media has just begun to pay attention to it, but they cant yet see the ties between Enron, Bush and the GOP.
The oil-soaked connections there and with the events of 9-11, the Saudis, bin Laden, the Carlyle Group, Deutschbank-A.B., Russia, Kosovo and others, if revealed, will rock the foundations of this administration, maybe even topple it.
Thats why were seeing the president trying mightily to distance himself from the whole mess and why Vice President Cheney stubbornly refuses to release information to congressional investigators that might prove incriminating.
As Joan Konner wrote: It is not just Dick Cheney, our fearless vice-president, who is hiding in a secure location because of the terrorist threat. The entire government, aided by the shield of the press, is concealing itself in the cave of crisis and war.