- Three female fugitives wanted in New Jersey restaurant theft arrested in Illinois
- Man guilty in 2012 crash into home that injured 8-year-old
- McDonald’s: Federal complaint says company is joint employer
- T-Mobile settlement: $90M for cell phone bill cramming
- Shelter Care Ministries gets $30,000 grant
- Even more dead bees?
- Holiday travel: 98.6 million plan getaway, most on record
- Scam artists posing as utility reps, demanding payment
- Holiday mailing deadlines approach, Rockford Post Office warns
- Hispanics more than half of all renters, yet most are uninsured
Higher rates give residents no choice
With all the various utility and municipal rates and fees going up apace around here for the people who have no choice but to subscribe to these necessary services, and who therefore have no choice but to accept and to pay them no matter how difficult their own personal, financial situation has become, especially lately; and no matter how unwilling, or even how not seriously interested, these entities that
the public primarily by the monopolistic power they hold over them are in pinching pennies and stretching dollars—again, especially lately—it’s important for Rockfordians to understand that, as of Oct. 13, there’s another, far more troubling breed of specter stalking the land than that of simple greed and profligacy, which always tends to afflict the powers that be, who nevertheless have been entrusted to fight the affliction, not turn it into a fine art for scoundrels.
As the economy has gotten progressively worse, keeping as many at, rather than paring as many city employees from, the public trough, has become the city fathers’ main, upside-down concern. They laid off 30, but rather than lay off 34 more, they passed a two-year-only (ha-ha) $3 increase in monthly garbage fees.
But it isn’t really an increase, which will come soon enough anyway; to keep our staff bigger than we can afford, mind you, it’s the wholesale creation of a whole new revenue stream/slush fund: $1.8 million a year
up from property taxes—and from the garbage-earmark accountability.
From the November 4-10, 2009 issue