- Conservatives join New Hampshire rally in support of campaign finance reform
- 11 public housing residents complete job readiness training
- Youth health care enrollment event at NIU Rockford Jan. 29
- More than 50 employers at Jan. 29 job fair
- School district’s credit rating remains solid
- State Police seize LSD, cannabis, U.S. currency in I-80 arrest
- Park District names employee, team of the year
- A closer look at fracking for natural gas
- Susan Johnson, copy editor, moves on after 21 years
- Guest Column: Clean Water Act: Supporters of clean water must make their voices heard
Clarification regarding ‘County’s stance vs. septic faces first test’
Responding to the article “County’s stance vs. septic faces first test” in the March 3-9 issue, Winnebago County Planning & Zoning Officer Troy Krup contacted The Rock River Times to dispute the accuracy of a statement indicating no opportunity for public input had been provided regarding the final plat and variation request for the Gensler property detailed in the article.
Krup indicated public comments were allowed during the Feb. 24 Zoning Committee meeting.
The final plat and variation request were not reviewed in a public hearing by the Zoning Board of Appeals, however, when public testimony is typically taken.
Zoning Committee member Paul Gorski (D-5) acknowledged that public notice was made regarding the committee meeting, as is the case for all committee meetings, but the agenda did not reflect an opportunity for public comments.
“Typically, we don’t have testimony given at Zoning Committee meetings,” Gorski noted. “We even open the meeting stating, ‘This is a meeting, not a hearing.’”
From the Mar. 10-16, 2010 issue