- Dems, Rauner spar over deficit solution; Senate Democrats poised to pass own version
- Minnie Minoso: Dead at 90, unbeaten
- Bring back legislative scholarships? Proposal faces serious questions from both sides
- First Friday opening for Olive Oil Experience
- RAM announce 74th Young Artist winners
- Texas Two-step: ‘Hogs sweep weekend, return home
- More highlights from the Chicago Auto Show
- Industry response to peak oil not enough long term
- TRRT March 4-10 | Online Edition
- Commentary: Walker’s budget calls for schools to stop reporting sexual assaults
To the Editor: Government cannot solve environmental problems
I noticed an interesting juxtaposition in the June 30-July 6 issue. On the front page, you had the article “Waterkeeper News” by Art Norris, about saving the rivers from large polluters and the need for better oversight along with requiring I.E.S. (Environmental Impact Statements). Also on the front page was the usual “Renewable Energy” column by Drs. Robert and Sonia Vogl, and finally, the sports page column by Jim Hagerty about the Asian carp problem.
What, you may ask, do these stories have in common? They all are written by people who are dedicated to environmental protection (hardly anyone would argue with that), and they are relying on the government to do the “heavy lifting” in terms of regulation, subsidies, studies, permits, etc. They are all doomed to disappointment. It’s foolish to expect the government to be either wise or effective in stewardship of our natural resources. You need only to look at their problem-solving skills in other areas (the economy, employment/job creation, immigration, health care, etc.).
How effective has the government been handling those?
Our rivers will be polluted, wind and solar energy will prove to be a giant boondoggle, and the Asian carp will find its way into the Great Lakes. Your writers have good intentions, but the road to hell is paved with them.
From the July 7-13, 2010 issue