- Three female fugitives wanted in New Jersey restaurant theft arrested in Illinois
- Man guilty in 2012 crash into home that injured 8-year-old
- McDonald’s: Federal complaint says company is joint employer
- T-Mobile settlement: $90M for cell phone bill cramming
- Shelter Care Ministries gets $30,000 grant
- Even more dead bees?
- Holiday travel: 98.6 million plan getaway, most on record
- Scam artists posing as utility reps, demanding payment
- Holiday mailing deadlines approach, Rockford Post Office warns
- Hispanics more than half of all renters, yet most are uninsured
To the Editor: Government cannot solve environmental problems
I noticed an interesting juxtaposition in the June 30-July 6 issue. On the front page, you had the article “Waterkeeper News” by Art Norris, about saving the rivers from large polluters and the need for better oversight along with requiring I.E.S. (Environmental Impact Statements). Also on the front page was the usual “Renewable Energy” column by Drs. Robert and Sonia Vogl, and finally, the sports page column by Jim Hagerty about the Asian carp problem.
What, you may ask, do these stories have in common? They all are written by people who are dedicated to environmental protection (hardly anyone would argue with that), and they are relying on the government to do the “heavy lifting” in terms of regulation, subsidies, studies, permits, etc. They are all doomed to disappointment. It’s foolish to expect the government to be either wise or effective in stewardship of our natural resources. You need only to look at their problem-solving skills in other areas (the economy, employment/job creation, immigration, health care, etc.).
How effective has the government been handling those?
Our rivers will be polluted, wind and solar energy will prove to be a giant boondoggle, and the Asian carp will find its way into the Great Lakes. Your writers have good intentions, but the road to hell is paved with them.
From the July 7-13, 2010 issue