<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Column: Jim Sacia supports mega-dairy over IEPA objectsions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/</link>
	<description>The Rock River Times - THE VOICE OF THE COMMUNITY SINCE 1993</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:52:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 02:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>A call was made to Jims office and asked about his letter. Jim laughed and belittled the caller and said he dosen&#039;t have to answer to anyone as to what he does. Funny if that conversation happened to be recorded. When Jim was informed, or really reminded of the fact that for two years Traditions has not paid their fee and did not complete the applications, Jim said, he didn&#039;t know that. What a LIAR Jim is and a what a weasly worm he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A call was made to Jims office and asked about his letter. Jim laughed and belittled the caller and said he dosen&#8217;t have to answer to anyone as to what he does. Funny if that conversation happened to be recorded. When Jim was informed, or really reminded of the fact that for two years Traditions has not paid their fee and did not complete the applications, Jim said, he didn&#8217;t know that. What a LIAR Jim is and a what a weasly worm he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Turner</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>And anyone should believe your &quot; alleged&quot; call on what date Nic?

   Integrity is Bern Colleran&#039;s middle name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And anyone should believe your &#8221; alleged&#8221; call on what date Nic?</p>
<p>   Integrity is Bern Colleran&#8217;s middle name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>Bern Colleran is having some trouble with holding together his commentary on Jim Sacia and the Corp of Engineers so call undermining and insinuation and manipulation.

In defending his original guest column he as a retired journalist has now quoted the Corp of Engineers without providing who he talked to in his so called conversation.  

Very convenient!

As a matter of fact I did Call Dan Johnson and Mike Hayes of the CORP in the Rock Island District office and shared with them Bern Collerans Quote “conversation” with  the CORP. There response to me was “We made no such statement.&quot;

Possibly Bern could provide this discussion with his source at the CORP or polish up on his journalistic integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bern Colleran is having some trouble with holding together his commentary on Jim Sacia and the Corp of Engineers so call undermining and insinuation and manipulation.</p>
<p>In defending his original guest column he as a retired journalist has now quoted the Corp of Engineers without providing who he talked to in his so called conversation.  </p>
<p>Very convenient!</p>
<p>As a matter of fact I did Call Dan Johnson and Mike Hayes of the CORP in the Rock Island District office and shared with them Bern Collerans Quote “conversation” with  the CORP. There response to me was “We made no such statement.&#8221;</p>
<p>Possibly Bern could provide this discussion with his source at the CORP or polish up on his journalistic integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bern Colleran</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>Bern Colleran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>I just noticed that Nic Anderson attempted to use the Daniel Johnson letter here, as well as in an e-mail to me to confuse the issue of Rep Sacia&#039;s attempt to undermine Illinois regulation of the &quot;Traditions&quot; Dairy. The Letter in question is from the US Army Corps&#039; Daniel Johnson to Allen Keller of IEPA (as below) to explain away Rep. Sacia&#039;s attempt to undermine the integrity of Illinois regulation in his 4/12/10 letter to the Army Corps.  

It’s interesting to note the way in which Anderson employs the letter in blogs and in the e-mail he sent to me.  (See below)  He just posts the letter without comment, as if the letter itself is self -explanatory and that its mere existence refutes whatever is posted above it.   I suppose there are some  who would actually point to the letter and say, “Well, look at this letter.  It proves what Nic Anderson is saying.”   

But Anderson and I  know why he doesn’t comment.  It’s because any claims he makes about the meaning of its contents would hold him to positions he knows to be false, and that’s legally dangerous.  We also note that he clipped the date off the Johnson letter.   His business ethics professor would say that’s disingenuous, too.  

Nic Anderson doesn’t need to comment on the Dan Johnson letter when he posts it because he’s trusting that most readers will assume from the 2nd paragraph that IEPA has not done its job in processing the WQC application and that  the waiver under the Clean Water Act is in play.   
 
The regulatory person at Army Corps I talked to was puzzled when I related that the Traditions forces  were using the Johnson letter in the way they have been.  &quot;I don&#039;t see that that letter lends them any support,&quot;  was the understated comment.  
 
The Army Corps person went on to give us the true meaning of the letter.  &quot;We were trying to find out if EPA had everything they needed from Traditions in order to make their decision on the Water Quality Certificate.  We determined they had not, and that EPA regarded the application as incomplete.  We agreed with EPA that they did not have a complete application, and that gave us stronger ground to not waive the requirement.   Our thinking is that because water quality is the issue of controversy in this case, we will not waive the requirement for the 401 Certifcate.  If they end up not getting a 401 Certificate, we will not certify them to build on portions of the 300 feet of stream.&quot;  
 
Surely the applicant (Traditions) should have known from their correspondence with IEPA over the past 2 years that that agency regarded the Traditions application as incomplete.  IEPA must have indicated to Traditions that they wanted something else -- more information, more compliance, something.   So Traditions and facility engineer Maurer Stutz knew all along that the reason for IEPA&#039;s failure to grant the Certification after 2 years was their own failure to provide information (or re-engineering or whatever was needed for compliance).  

So, the upshot?    The attempt to have Army Corps waive its requirement of the Water Quality Certification was an attempt by Rep Sacia and the Illinois Livestock Development Board (Nic Anderson) to do an end run around the state&#039;s own legitimate regulatory requirements.   

We understand Mr. Anderson’s attempt to influence the process.  He is just a shill trying to avoid honest work and still earn a living.  We still do not understand or condone Illinois State Representative Sacia&#039;s attempt to convince others to ignore the regulatory prerogatives of the State of Illinois. 
 
Bern Colleran  
Warren, Illinois</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed that Nic Anderson attempted to use the Daniel Johnson letter here, as well as in an e-mail to me to confuse the issue of Rep Sacia&#8217;s attempt to undermine Illinois regulation of the &#8220;Traditions&#8221; Dairy. The Letter in question is from the US Army Corps&#8217; Daniel Johnson to Allen Keller of IEPA (as below) to explain away Rep. Sacia&#8217;s attempt to undermine the integrity of Illinois regulation in his 4/12/10 letter to the Army Corps.  </p>
<p>It’s interesting to note the way in which Anderson employs the letter in blogs and in the e-mail he sent to me.  (See below)  He just posts the letter without comment, as if the letter itself is self -explanatory and that its mere existence refutes whatever is posted above it.   I suppose there are some  who would actually point to the letter and say, “Well, look at this letter.  It proves what Nic Anderson is saying.”   </p>
<p>But Anderson and I  know why he doesn’t comment.  It’s because any claims he makes about the meaning of its contents would hold him to positions he knows to be false, and that’s legally dangerous.  We also note that he clipped the date off the Johnson letter.   His business ethics professor would say that’s disingenuous, too.  </p>
<p>Nic Anderson doesn’t need to comment on the Dan Johnson letter when he posts it because he’s trusting that most readers will assume from the 2nd paragraph that IEPA has not done its job in processing the WQC application and that  the waiver under the Clean Water Act is in play.   </p>
<p>The regulatory person at Army Corps I talked to was puzzled when I related that the Traditions forces  were using the Johnson letter in the way they have been.  &#8220;I don&#8217;t see that that letter lends them any support,&#8221;  was the understated comment.  </p>
<p>The Army Corps person went on to give us the true meaning of the letter.  &#8220;We were trying to find out if EPA had everything they needed from Traditions in order to make their decision on the Water Quality Certificate.  We determined they had not, and that EPA regarded the application as incomplete.  We agreed with EPA that they did not have a complete application, and that gave us stronger ground to not waive the requirement.   Our thinking is that because water quality is the issue of controversy in this case, we will not waive the requirement for the 401 Certifcate.  If they end up not getting a 401 Certificate, we will not certify them to build on portions of the 300 feet of stream.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Surely the applicant (Traditions) should have known from their correspondence with IEPA over the past 2 years that that agency regarded the Traditions application as incomplete.  IEPA must have indicated to Traditions that they wanted something else &#8212; more information, more compliance, something.   So Traditions and facility engineer Maurer Stutz knew all along that the reason for IEPA&#8217;s failure to grant the Certification after 2 years was their own failure to provide information (or re-engineering or whatever was needed for compliance).  </p>
<p>So, the upshot?    The attempt to have Army Corps waive its requirement of the Water Quality Certification was an attempt by Rep Sacia and the Illinois Livestock Development Board (Nic Anderson) to do an end run around the state&#8217;s own legitimate regulatory requirements.   </p>
<p>We understand Mr. Anderson’s attempt to influence the process.  He is just a shill trying to avoid honest work and still earn a living.  We still do not understand or condone Illinois State Representative Sacia&#8217;s attempt to convince others to ignore the regulatory prerogatives of the State of Illinois. </p>
<p>Bern Colleran<br />
Warren, Illinois</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>Nic,
 Could you please explain what happened to all of those eggs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nic,<br />
 Could you please explain what happened to all of those eggs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>Good work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>Nic,
 
Come on over for breakfast. I&#039;ll scramble

you some eggs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nic,</p>
<p>Come on over for breakfast. I&#8217;ll scramble</p>
<p>you some eggs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>John, are you still a reporter for the Journal Standard?

This would make good press over there.

Why havn&#039;t they picked up on Sacia&#039;s good works?

Feel free to call or email

217/622-7491

ILDG@ILFB.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, are you still a reporter for the Journal Standard?</p>
<p>This would make good press over there.</p>
<p>Why havn&#8217;t they picked up on Sacia&#8217;s good works?</p>
<p>Feel free to call or email</p>
<p>217/622-7491</p>
<p><a href="mailto:ILDG@ILFB.org">ILDG@ILFB.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t go to any website you offer. There&#039;s probably a virus so a good shower and 14 days of penecillian will be required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t go to any website you offer. There&#8217;s probably a virus so a good shower and 14 days of penecillian will be required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>Nic,
Why don&#039;t your letters have any dates on them? Why do you waste everyones time in trying to deceive? Do you also doctor up or alter in any way, your paperwork in your office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nic,<br />
Why don&#8217;t your letters have any dates on them? Why do you waste everyones time in trying to deceive? Do you also doctor up or alter in any way, your paperwork in your office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>Here s a link to some real intelligence. 

I would be real proud to &quot;befuddle&quot; this lesson to my children. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pje69hExqwo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here s a link to some real intelligence. </p>
<p>I would be real proud to &#8220;befuddle&#8221; this lesson to my children. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pje69hExqwo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pje69hExqwo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Turner</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>So Nic, I still think Bern is intelligent, and forthright...traits that would befuddle a paid lobbyist, who&#039;s job is becoming obsolete.

ANY private citizen who wishes to communicate with a government office is free to do so.  I&#039;m sure you know this, and have managed to wear out your welcome.
  Beware livestock owners, hide your money in your mattress, Nic Anderson of the Il. Livestock Development Group is coming.  He will lead you down the road to disaster just like A.J. Bos of Bakersfield CA.

There would have been no legal battle needed without Nic Anderson force feeding a 10,ooo cow mega dairy less than 2 miles from homes,businesses, schools, clinic, churches etc.43 lovely acres of manure atop the origin of the Apple River.  The facility would be legally able to double every 2 years with no setbacks..... 
Why don&#039;t you set up the same proposal for Divernon, IL.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Nic, I still think Bern is intelligent, and forthright&#8230;traits that would befuddle a paid lobbyist, who&#8217;s job is becoming obsolete.</p>
<p>ANY private citizen who wishes to communicate with a government office is free to do so.  I&#8217;m sure you know this, and have managed to wear out your welcome.<br />
  Beware livestock owners, hide your money in your mattress, Nic Anderson of the Il. Livestock Development Group is coming.  He will lead you down the road to disaster just like A.J. Bos of Bakersfield CA.</p>
<p>There would have been no legal battle needed without Nic Anderson force feeding a 10,ooo cow mega dairy less than 2 miles from homes,businesses, schools, clinic, churches etc.43 lovely acres of manure atop the origin of the Apple River.  The facility would be legally able to double every 2 years with no setbacks&#8230;..<br />
Why don&#8217;t you set up the same proposal for Divernon, IL.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>Looks like a little deception on Berns part.

Suzy John and Walter should be upset with Bern.........Shame Shame!

FROM BERN COLLERAN 305 COLE ST., WARREN, ILL. 

To: Brown Hodge, Carolyn, office of Governor Quinn 
Cc: dave albee; 
Subject: Here&#039;s a development 

Carolyn: 

Left message for you earlier alerting you that the Attorney for the H.O.M.E.S. group (the Jo Daviess County MegaDairy issue) was going to contact you re: latest development in the saga. The attorney, Dave Albee 
has gotten extremely busy for the next 24 hours on another legal development, so I volunteered to get the message to you. 

And it is this: 
If you&#039;ll take 3 minutes to read the ATTACHED press release which we&#039;re confident will get some press 
up in the NW corner of the state, it will likely strike you, as it does us, that there is a serious disconnect between 2 of the state&#039;s agencies on the issue. 

We have, on the one hand: 
The Department of Agriculture which continues to refuse to review its own approval last May of a permit for the Nora, Illinois Megadairy despite very numerous problems the department has had with details of the application even SINCE theapproval................As you also know, Governor Quinn&#039;s letter to the Jo Daviess County Board was instrumental in securing the first official opposition to the factory farm 17 months ago. 

Carolyn, forgive us, but we in Jo Daviess County cannot keep from thinking that it is time the Governor took action to stop the official charade being perpetrated by Dept of Agriculture. 

&gt;We think it&#039;s time theGovernor hinted to the Ag Dept&lt; that a review of this case would be a good thing for Illinois. The pronouncement by ISGS gives everyone, including even the Department of Agriculture, an opportunity to say, 

&#039;Well, in light of this clear evidence from ISGS, perhaps we ought to look at this issue again for the sake of the state&#039;s natural resources and the neighbors who rely on the State to fulfill its constitutional mandate to provide a healthy environment.&#039; 

Thanks for anything you can do to get this matter before the Governor who, we know from experience, will do the best thing. 

Bern Colleran 
Warren, Illinois</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a little deception on Berns part.</p>
<p>Suzy John and Walter should be upset with Bern&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;Shame Shame!</p>
<p>FROM BERN COLLERAN 305 COLE ST., WARREN, ILL. </p>
<p>To: Brown Hodge, Carolyn, office of Governor Quinn<br />
Cc: dave albee;<br />
Subject: Here&#8217;s a development </p>
<p>Carolyn: </p>
<p>Left message for you earlier alerting you that the Attorney for the H.O.M.E.S. group (the Jo Daviess County MegaDairy issue) was going to contact you re: latest development in the saga. The attorney, Dave Albee<br />
has gotten extremely busy for the next 24 hours on another legal development, so I volunteered to get the message to you. </p>
<p>And it is this:<br />
If you&#8217;ll take 3 minutes to read the ATTACHED press release which we&#8217;re confident will get some press<br />
up in the NW corner of the state, it will likely strike you, as it does us, that there is a serious disconnect between 2 of the state&#8217;s agencies on the issue. </p>
<p>We have, on the one hand:<br />
The Department of Agriculture which continues to refuse to review its own approval last May of a permit for the Nora, Illinois Megadairy despite very numerous problems the department has had with details of the application even SINCE theapproval&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.As you also know, Governor Quinn&#8217;s letter to the Jo Daviess County Board was instrumental in securing the first official opposition to the factory farm 17 months ago. </p>
<p>Carolyn, forgive us, but we in Jo Daviess County cannot keep from thinking that it is time the Governor took action to stop the official charade being perpetrated by Dept of Agriculture. </p>
<p>&gt;We think it&#8217;s time theGovernor hinted to the Ag Dept&lt; that a review of this case would be a good thing for Illinois. The pronouncement by ISGS gives everyone, including even the Department of Agriculture, an opportunity to say, </p>
<p>&#039;Well, in light of this clear evidence from ISGS, perhaps we ought to look at this issue again for the sake of the state&#039;s natural resources and the neighbors who rely on the State to fulfill its constitutional mandate to provide a healthy environment.&#039; </p>
<p>Thanks for anything you can do to get this matter before the Governor who, we know from experience, will do the best thing. </p>
<p>Bern Colleran<br />
Warren, Illinois</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>Poor Nic. He&#039;s having a hard time keeping up with the Bern letter.
It&#039;s all over the nation and many parts of the world.
Koodos to the World Wide Web.
And Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.
Get it, Nic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Nic. He&#8217;s having a hard time keeping up with the Bern letter.<br />
It&#8217;s all over the nation and many parts of the world.<br />
Koodos to the World Wide Web.<br />
And Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.<br />
Get it, Nic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter M. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter M. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr.Anderson,could it be that the IEPA is doing the right thing by not issuing  information,because Mr. Bos has not done everything that was to be done,as well as testing that needed to be done...so how do you issue permits when you do not have all the information...Are you trying to tell me that it is ok to stall and not provide the information that needs to be provided at the time it is stated and then expect the IEPA to just hand out information or the go ahead and build status. If,this is allowed to happen then we really have something very wrong here. If, I was a State Representative candidate,(which I was)then I would have to be &quot; neutral&quot;,you should let the courts decide on the issue of Traditions Dairy.You are suppose to REPRESENT both sides of the issue on this.In 2008,when I ran against Mr. Sacia(who is 100%) for Traditions Dairy, I was against Traditions Dairy,because I knew the many impacts this dairy would do to the county. So in conclusion, please Mr. Anderson,keep telling us how great Mr. Sacia is and how he is a great champion for everything.

Walter Johnson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr.Anderson,could it be that the IEPA is doing the right thing by not issuing  information,because Mr. Bos has not done everything that was to be done,as well as testing that needed to be done&#8230;so how do you issue permits when you do not have all the information&#8230;Are you trying to tell me that it is ok to stall and not provide the information that needs to be provided at the time it is stated and then expect the IEPA to just hand out information or the go ahead and build status. If,this is allowed to happen then we really have something very wrong here. If, I was a State Representative candidate,(which I was)then I would have to be &#8221; neutral&#8221;,you should let the courts decide on the issue of Traditions Dairy.You are suppose to REPRESENT both sides of the issue on this.In 2008,when I ran against Mr. Sacia(who is 100%) for Traditions Dairy, I was against Traditions Dairy,because I knew the many impacts this dairy would do to the county. So in conclusion, please Mr. Anderson,keep telling us how great Mr. Sacia is and how he is a great champion for everything.</p>
<p>Walter Johnson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>Why is ther no date on this letter? Could it be that Traditions did NOT give the information that IEPA repeatly requested? 
ZOINKIES SCOOBY DOO!
I&#039;m glad that so many concerned citizens, activists and federal agencies are investigating the corruption that Illinois politicians and their lobbyists have felt too comfortable for too long with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is ther no date on this letter? Could it be that Traditions did NOT give the information that IEPA repeatly requested?<br />
ZOINKIES SCOOBY DOO!<br />
I&#8217;m glad that so many concerned citizens, activists and federal agencies are investigating the corruption that Illinois politicians and their lobbyists have felt too comfortable for too long with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Turner</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>Why is the Keller letter undated?
Why does Representative Sacia waive or support a waive that impedes protection of the public at large from water contamination?
IN A CORRECT AND ACCURATE TIMELINE, DATES ARE REQUIRED. This letter to Keller is more than likely out of context or the date would be included.  As of court trial 12/09, Traditions had not turned in required information and application to the IEPA thus creating a disconnect and delay in departments and the permitting process. The representative is not acting on behalf of constituents that pay taxes in the 89th district.  He is wooing one of the  largest ammonia emitters in the country to open up shop(originally proposed 12,000 cow mega dairy) in beautiful Jo Daviess County. 43 acres of manure set upon the origin of the Apple River.  Sacia thinks it fine to fill in 300 ft of stream, and then store 43 acres of manure on top. A design for disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the Keller letter undated?<br />
Why does Representative Sacia waive or support a waive that impedes protection of the public at large from water contamination?<br />
IN A CORRECT AND ACCURATE TIMELINE, DATES ARE REQUIRED. This letter to Keller is more than likely out of context or the date would be included.  As of court trial 12/09, Traditions had not turned in required information and application to the IEPA thus creating a disconnect and delay in departments and the permitting process. The representative is not acting on behalf of constituents that pay taxes in the 89th district.  He is wooing one of the  largest ammonia emitters in the country to open up shop(originally proposed 12,000 cow mega dairy) in beautiful Jo Daviess County. 43 acres of manure set upon the origin of the Apple River.  Sacia thinks it fine to fill in 300 ft of stream, and then store 43 acres of manure on top. A design for disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2010/08/11/guest-column-jim-sacia-supports-mega-dairy-over-iepa-objectsions/comment-page-1/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=25953#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>Bern seems to have missed the Corps letter to IEPA about missing a 1 year deadline. Looks like Sacia is just holding IEPA accountable.&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

Mr. Allen Keller P.E. 
Manager permit Section 
Division of Water pollution Control 
1021 North Grand Avenue East 
Springfield Illinois, 62794 

Subject: Section 401 Water Quality Certification for tradition Dairy, Jo Daviess County, IEPA log #C-0263-08 

Dear Mr. Keller 

We are writing regarding the permit application that we have from Tradition Dairy, and the attached letter from the applicant regarding your 401 Water Quality Certification. 
We seek your comments on this matter. 

We received the permit application nearly two years ago. Under the Clean Water Act,33 U.S.C &amp; 1341(a), if a state fails to act on a request for water certification within one year, the certification is waived. 

We are attempting to determine weather a waiver has occurred in this instance. Has your agency received a valid request for certification? If it did, when did this occur? Also, please provide any additional information on this matter so the Corps of Engineers can make an informed decision regarding waiver. Please provide your comments by 30 April 2010. 


Sincerely 
Daniel J. Johnson 
Chief Regulatory Branch 
U.S.C.O.E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bern seems to have missed the Corps letter to IEPA about missing a 1 year deadline. Looks like Sacia is just holding IEPA accountable.&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>Mr. Allen Keller P.E.<br />
Manager permit Section<br />
Division of Water pollution Control<br />
1021 North Grand Avenue East<br />
Springfield Illinois, 62794 </p>
<p>Subject: Section 401 Water Quality Certification for tradition Dairy, Jo Daviess County, IEPA log #C-0263-08 </p>
<p>Dear Mr. Keller </p>
<p>We are writing regarding the permit application that we have from Tradition Dairy, and the attached letter from the applicant regarding your 401 Water Quality Certification.<br />
We seek your comments on this matter. </p>
<p>We received the permit application nearly two years ago. Under the Clean Water Act,33 U.S.C &amp; 1341(a), if a state fails to act on a request for water certification within one year, the certification is waived. </p>
<p>We are attempting to determine weather a waiver has occurred in this instance. Has your agency received a valid request for certification? If it did, when did this occur? Also, please provide any additional information on this matter so the Corps of Engineers can make an informed decision regarding waiver. Please provide your comments by 30 April 2010. </p>
<p>Sincerely<br />
Daniel J. Johnson<br />
Chief Regulatory Branch<br />
U.S.C.O.E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
