- Lawmaker says license plate readers a privacy threat
- Bryant not the first to feel impact of free agency rules
- State Roundup: Parents’ group calls for standardized test opt-out bill
- Hononegah Mack: ‘The best woman in the county’
- The tip of the iceberg: Human trafficking in America
- State Roundup: House passes proposal to fill current fiscal year budget gap
- ‘Hogs streak hits 4 as race tightens
- Neighborhood feel key for Rural on Tap
- TRRT March 25-31 | Online Edition
- State Roundup: Plaintiffs join Rauner on fair share case
To the Editor: Scale down the dairy program at university
The University of Kentucky sold off their large dairy herd, now the University of Minnesota has followed suit. This is the fourth university to quit “Big Dairying.” The interesting part is that the university was given 436 acres of land in the early 1900s. Even they could not make it with all their donations and financial support. You can’t teach an ag model that is not financially and environmentally sustainable. If it fails in the real world and sets students up to call a suicide hotline for farmers, what is the point of the “modern” mega dairy?
July 23, the University of Minnesota-Crookston auctioned off its entire dairy herd. This was done in conjunction with the ending of their dairy program. The university will consolidate its operations around the state. The Northwest Regional Outreach and Research Center’s decision to sell its 235 head of dairy cattle was the result of budget cuts and determining how to best serve the UM campuses by eliminating duplication in programs. This decision saves UMC about $300,000 annually, but will result in a job loss of six to seven. The university is considering a proposal to expand its beef and sheep programs and start a new, small-scale dairy program with 30 to 40 milking cows.
Such a dairy model encourages economic growth in rural communities. We need more farmers and their small dairies to support the local infrastructure. We need to repair the damage “Modern Mega Dairy Models” have inflicted on the agricultural landscape.
From the Aug. 11-17, 2010 issue