Breaking News

Guest Column: Should a mosque be built near the World Trade Center?

September 8, 2010

By Rev./CH. (Ret.) Kent Svendsen

  I was angry when I first heard of the plans to build a mosque near the site of the World Trade Center site. That rather surprised me since I have actively pursued friendships within the Muslim community. I decided that the response was not motivated by bigotry and prejudice but by a reopening of old wounds. And while there certainly is and always will be bigotry and prejudice in the world, I don’t believe that it is the motivating factor behind the majority of those who oppose the building of the mosque. I say this because most people remember the day of the attack, and it still affects them. I remembered a relative of mine talking about running to get their children from a nearby school and seeing bodies falling from the tower onto the ground. I realize that it was those old wounds that were opened up when the idea of a mosque near the site was presented.

  But I also realized that my judgment had been clouded concerning this issue. So I contacted friends in the Muslim community. After all, you can’t show love for your Muslim friends and still harbor anger against Islam as a whole. Here was one of their responses:

  “My personal view is that legally the Muslims have every right to build a mosque at the privately-owned site. The American Constitution and our traditional values uphold that right, but morally the Muslims (in that faith community) would appear callous if they do not care about the feelings of their neighbors.

   “Having said that, I submit that the process to educate common Americans about Islam should not stop so that the Americans do not think that a mosque is an abode of terror. It is not.”

  My conclusion: If we don’t allow them to build the mosque, we will look just as callous as they will look if they do. It will also raise accusations that our nation is bigoted and prejudiced against the Muslim world.

  The Muslim group says the reason they want to build the mosque is so it can be a place of dialogue and understanding between faith groups. Unfortunately, by building the mosque, they will erect roadblocks to those same goals. And while it might be cheered by a minority on the far left, for the majority it will become a thorn in their side.

  So what is the answer? One way would be for the leaders of the group to acknowledge how callous and insensitive it would be to build at that site right now. Then choose a different site and invite all to come to the new mosque and be in interfaith dialogue. Perhaps a more radical idea would be to invite St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church (the church that was destroyed in the attack) to join them in building a joint worship center in which both Muslims and Christians worship in the same building.

          The Rev. Kent Svendsen is an ordained United Methodist minister and a retired Army Reserve chaplain. His credentials include four years as an adviser and four years as a full Board of Visitors member for the Western Hemisphere Of Security Cooperation.

From the Sept. 8-14, 2010 issue

2 Comments

  1. jason ssg

    September 8, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    First off- if we want to go for a factual understanding, it helps if the conversation about the “Ground Zero Mosque” at some point touches on the fact that it’s not a mosque. You did manage to say “near” instead of “at” as most detractors phrase it, but you stopped correcting there.

    The proposal to create an interfaith community center is a good one- every town should have a few. My experience in Rockford is that much of the interfaith community here seems to center around the U.U. Church. There should be more meeting places of the kind where people of differing faiths, and those from outside of faith communities, could feel comfortable sharing ideas and coming together.

    Other than that, I don’t know if it’s good etiquette to post a link to another website in a comment, but I think The Onion sums up most folks grasp of the subject nicely in their article from August 30th- “Man Already Knows Everything He Needs To Know About Muslims”

  2. Valere

    September 12, 2010 at 12:39 am

    Well if I look at the statement that has passed through my years of life I would have to say that in today’s society you are guilty by association. In the case of 9-11 I still feel that IF the muslims plan on putting it at, near, around or even on top of the WTC then they are just asking to be guilty by association. They stand offended that we Americans hold grudges and act the bigot but yet here I see NO sympathy to the situation. So please let them put it up so I can sit back and watch in the news how their sanctum get blown up too. If they think for two seconds that they are safe praying in that building on a day to day basis then sadly they are blinded by the polite faces that talk to them during the day and hate them behind doors.

    As far as I can see we have accepted the muslims that they are all not the same as the people of whom are said to be the culprits of 9-11. I think they need to take that into consideration and not build this thing right now. We are all not mentally or emotionally over this and they all really need to come to terms that it is going to take a long time for people to look the other way. There are families out there that still to this day will not have any closure to the deaths of their loved ones. Their constant reminder of WTC in their everyday lives shows them what they lost and will never know what truly happened to them. That in its self should have made the muslims turn this project down!

    And just for a bit of clarification I myself highly doubt that their sole intent is for community “dialog and understanding” I am thinking more along the lines of rubbing our nose it. I would just LOVE to witness a Christian walk into a mosque and at any one point and time feel comfortable!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>