- Lawmaker says license plate readers a privacy threat
- Bryant not the first to feel impact of free agency rules
- State Roundup: Parents’ group calls for standardized test opt-out bill
- Hononegah Mack: ‘The best woman in the county’
- The tip of the iceberg: Human trafficking in America
- State Roundup: House passes proposal to fill current fiscal year budget gap
- ‘Hogs streak hits 4 as race tightens
- Neighborhood feel key for Rural on Tap
- TRRT March 25-31 | Online Edition
- State Roundup: Plaintiffs join Rauner on fair share case
Debate on casinos may be suppressed
Chuck Sweeny really knows how to stimulate a response! When he stated in Sunday’s paper [June 26, 2011] that those “moralists” opposed to casinos in Rockford have little support. On the contrary, I have observed that everyone I talk with on the subject is opposed to casinos. Those people are leaders in the community on many different levels in the service and corporate world. My impression is that the Star is suppressing actual debate on the topic by only headlining the incorrect statements that “everyone is for casinos.” I would be proud of the Star if it actually reported community sentiment on the topic, especially if this letter is printed. There are better ways to build the economy of this region. It may take some work, but it has more chance for building a livable community than casinos can.
Dr. Philip R. Schalow
1st Step Chiropractic, S.C.
From the Aug. 3-9, 2011, issue