<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Column: City’s removal of street lights makes Rockford less safe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/11/23/guest-column-city%E2%80%99s-removal-of-street-lights-makes-rockford-less-safe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/11/23/guest-column-city%e2%80%99s-removal-of-street-lights-makes-rockford-less-safe/</link>
	<description>The Rock River Times - THE VOICE OF THE COMMUNITY SINCE 1993</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:51:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/11/23/guest-column-city%e2%80%99s-removal-of-street-lights-makes-rockford-less-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-4086</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=34457#comment-4086</guid>
		<description>I am fascinated by the number of people who are concerned about &quot;feeling&quot; safe, but not interested in actually BEING safe.  Stats and studies prove - over and over again! - that LESS lighting actually reduces crime, and MORE lighting increases it.  
- FBI stat: 60% of crime happens during the DAY.  
- Chicago study dark alley vs. lighted alley; darker alley saw decreased crime - lighted alley saw increased crime.
- Essex, England - 50% reduction in crime after turning off ALL streetlights.

Rockford has a high crime rate.  Why wouldn&#039;t you want to use PROVEN methods to reduce crime, i.e., turning OFF lights?  Guess who else is afraid of the dark?  CRIMINALS!

Don&#039;t help them see you and what you have they can rob off of you.  Let your eyes work as nature intended at night; to see movements.  Glare/light diminishes that, and stats prove we are safer when darker.  

Stop letting your emotions rule, and follow the facts: Darker = safer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am fascinated by the number of people who are concerned about &#8220;feeling&#8221; safe, but not interested in actually BEING safe.  Stats and studies prove &#8211; over and over again! &#8211; that LESS lighting actually reduces crime, and MORE lighting increases it.<br />
- FBI stat: 60% of crime happens during the DAY.<br />
- Chicago study dark alley vs. lighted alley; darker alley saw decreased crime &#8211; lighted alley saw increased crime.<br />
- Essex, England &#8211; 50% reduction in crime after turning off ALL streetlights.</p>
<p>Rockford has a high crime rate.  Why wouldn&#8217;t you want to use PROVEN methods to reduce crime, i.e., turning OFF lights?  Guess who else is afraid of the dark?  CRIMINALS!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t help them see you and what you have they can rob off of you.  Let your eyes work as nature intended at night; to see movements.  Glare/light diminishes that, and stats prove we are safer when darker.  </p>
<p>Stop letting your emotions rule, and follow the facts: Darker = safer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Long</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/11/23/guest-column-city%e2%80%99s-removal-of-street-lights-makes-rockford-less-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=34457#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>It is obvious that the elected officials have become out of touch with the people that they were elected to serve. It is an American right to feel safe and be safe in the community in which we live. Giving would be criminals an advantage not to be identified is a step backwards. Why form a neighborhood watch when you cannot see in the dark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is obvious that the elected officials have become out of touch with the people that they were elected to serve. It is an American right to feel safe and be safe in the community in which we live. Giving would be criminals an advantage not to be identified is a step backwards. Why form a neighborhood watch when you cannot see in the dark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/11/23/guest-column-city%e2%80%99s-removal-of-street-lights-makes-rockford-less-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-4001</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=34457#comment-4001</guid>
		<description>Out of curiosity I have called the 1-866-639-3531 number that is listed but it has not been in service ever..there is just a recording saying &quot; you have reached a number that is not in service&quot; What kind of a joke is that???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiosity I have called the 1-866-639-3531 number that is listed but it has not been in service ever..there is just a recording saying &#8221; you have reached a number that is not in service&#8221; What kind of a joke is that???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/11/23/guest-column-city%e2%80%99s-removal-of-street-lights-makes-rockford-less-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-3991</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=34457#comment-3991</guid>
		<description>Is the above from the Tea Party saying we should turn out all street lights? Stoplights also? Anything not mandated by the constitution... stop providing water, no sewage, no trash pick up, no plowing, no benefits for veterans, no research into illness, no air traffic controllers, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the above from the Tea Party saying we should turn out all street lights? Stoplights also? Anything not mandated by the constitution&#8230; stop providing water, no sewage, no trash pick up, no plowing, no benefits for veterans, no research into illness, no air traffic controllers, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockfordteaparty</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/11/23/guest-column-city%e2%80%99s-removal-of-street-lights-makes-rockford-less-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-3975</link>
		<dc:creator>rockfordteaparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=34457#comment-3975</guid>
		<description>Non-binding Resolution Denouncing Confiscatory Taxation and Redistributive Spending Priorities By The Federal Government

We the people of _______ (County, Township, City) are resolved as a council representing the community, do hereby lodge our formal complaint and displeasure with our Federal Government for taking an inordinate amount of our money via Taxes and wasting that money on various Federal Programs and expenses that have seriously impaired our ability as a (County, Township, City) to pay for local basic services needed to maintain the public safety and promote the common good of our community.

As an elected body representing the people of _______(County, Township, City), it is the purpose of this non-binding resolution to register our condemnation of the Federal Government&#039;s unrestrained spending. It is our hope that in passing this resolution our Federal representatives will listen to the American people when we say that we are taxed enough and the Federal Government&#039;s problem is one of out of control spending.

Our tax burden as individuals and businesses continually escalates in order to finance programs not appropriate under the Constitution&#039;s original intent. While it is certainly a noble venture to give philanthropically, it is not an enumerated power for the Federal government to function as a philanthropic organization. The heavy burden of Federal taxation has limited our ability to give to the charities of our choice, to invest, to save, or to spend. The enormous Federal tax bill imposed on the residents of this community limits the available tax dollars for our local government.

The dwindling funds available at our local level has caused us to trim our budgets putting even the most basic of services in jeopardy. Yet Federal officials continue spending at unprecedented levels, taxes are increased, new taxes levied, debt continues to accumulate, and deficits climb to record highs. We do recognize the Federal government has its appropriate role, it does have its Constitutional obligations, but it also has limits.

History shows us that the current tax and spend philosophy and accompanying policies are a failure. History also shows that cutting taxes and Government spending works towards the goal of stimulating economic growth which is the only proven means of increasing revenue for the government.

We call upon Congress and the President to stop the economically destructive practices that are damaging this community and the futures of generations still to come. It is time for Congress and the President to only do those things obligated to them by the Constitution, which is the surest way to achieve the necessary cuts to bring the Federal budget into balance.

This non-binding resolution simply states what we feel as an elected body about the waste, fraud and abuse by the Federal Government in regard to our tax dollars. We do hereby respectfully request as a body that the Federal Government immediately begin downsizing and cutting Federal taxes to allow us as a local government entity the ability to collect an adequate amount of taxes while we also tighten our budgets in order to pay for basic services and public safety needs without placing undue hardships on our residents.

Respectfully and Sincerely

__________________(city, county, township)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-binding Resolution Denouncing Confiscatory Taxation and Redistributive Spending Priorities By The Federal Government</p>
<p>We the people of _______ (County, Township, City) are resolved as a council representing the community, do hereby lodge our formal complaint and displeasure with our Federal Government for taking an inordinate amount of our money via Taxes and wasting that money on various Federal Programs and expenses that have seriously impaired our ability as a (County, Township, City) to pay for local basic services needed to maintain the public safety and promote the common good of our community.</p>
<p>As an elected body representing the people of _______(County, Township, City), it is the purpose of this non-binding resolution to register our condemnation of the Federal Government&#8217;s unrestrained spending. It is our hope that in passing this resolution our Federal representatives will listen to the American people when we say that we are taxed enough and the Federal Government&#8217;s problem is one of out of control spending.</p>
<p>Our tax burden as individuals and businesses continually escalates in order to finance programs not appropriate under the Constitution&#8217;s original intent. While it is certainly a noble venture to give philanthropically, it is not an enumerated power for the Federal government to function as a philanthropic organization. The heavy burden of Federal taxation has limited our ability to give to the charities of our choice, to invest, to save, or to spend. The enormous Federal tax bill imposed on the residents of this community limits the available tax dollars for our local government.</p>
<p>The dwindling funds available at our local level has caused us to trim our budgets putting even the most basic of services in jeopardy. Yet Federal officials continue spending at unprecedented levels, taxes are increased, new taxes levied, debt continues to accumulate, and deficits climb to record highs. We do recognize the Federal government has its appropriate role, it does have its Constitutional obligations, but it also has limits.</p>
<p>History shows us that the current tax and spend philosophy and accompanying policies are a failure. History also shows that cutting taxes and Government spending works towards the goal of stimulating economic growth which is the only proven means of increasing revenue for the government.</p>
<p>We call upon Congress and the President to stop the economically destructive practices that are damaging this community and the futures of generations still to come. It is time for Congress and the President to only do those things obligated to them by the Constitution, which is the surest way to achieve the necessary cuts to bring the Federal budget into balance.</p>
<p>This non-binding resolution simply states what we feel as an elected body about the waste, fraud and abuse by the Federal Government in regard to our tax dollars. We do hereby respectfully request as a body that the Federal Government immediately begin downsizing and cutting Federal taxes to allow us as a local government entity the ability to collect an adequate amount of taxes while we also tighten our budgets in order to pay for basic services and public safety needs without placing undue hardships on our residents.</p>
<p>Respectfully and Sincerely</p>
<p>__________________(city, county, township)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gentry</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/11/23/guest-column-city%e2%80%99s-removal-of-street-lights-makes-rockford-less-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-3971</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gentry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=34457#comment-3971</guid>
		<description>So, for $10-$15 I can get the same light the city pays $20 for? That would equal a savings to the city (without turning OFF a single light) of somewhere between $1.6 million and $800,000 per year simply by paying the same fee someone with a single light would pay. It seems that anyone with 3rd grade education could negotiate a better price on 14,000 lights than on one.

Remember this at election time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, for $10-$15 I can get the same light the city pays $20 for? That would equal a savings to the city (without turning OFF a single light) of somewhere between $1.6 million and $800,000 per year simply by paying the same fee someone with a single light would pay. It seems that anyone with 3rd grade education could negotiate a better price on 14,000 lights than on one.</p>
<p>Remember this at election time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin miller</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/11/23/guest-column-city%e2%80%99s-removal-of-street-lights-makes-rockford-less-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-3970</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=34457#comment-3970</guid>
		<description>why doesn&#039;t the city of Rockford (whom is a very large  customer of ComEd) negotiate a much more competitive rate with ComEd when it comes to stret light costs in particular?  Seems like a no-brainer to me. Sure would be much more sensible than shutting off lights and jeopardizing people&#039;s safety. Where Nancy Johnsons lives, are her neighborhoods&#039; lights turned off ? Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why doesn&#8217;t the city of Rockford (whom is a very large  customer of ComEd) negotiate a much more competitive rate with ComEd when it comes to stret light costs in particular?  Seems like a no-brainer to me. Sure would be much more sensible than shutting off lights and jeopardizing people&#8217;s safety. Where Nancy Johnsons lives, are her neighborhoods&#8217; lights turned off ? Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
