<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Column: Staying relevant — why the library must change and embrace the digital revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/12/21/guest-column-staying-relevant-%E2%80%94-why-the-library-must-change-and-embrace-the-digital-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/12/21/guest-column-staying-relevant-%e2%80%94-why-the-library-must-change-and-embrace-the-digital-revolution/</link>
	<description>The Rock River Times - THE VOICE OF THE COMMUNITY SINCE 1993</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:33:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joan lender</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/12/21/guest-column-staying-relevant-%e2%80%94-why-the-library-must-change-and-embrace-the-digital-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4354</link>
		<dc:creator>joan lender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=34950#comment-4354</guid>
		<description>If only 15% of the population read digital books and the majority using the library couldn&#039;t afford E-readers - why even consider going digital? Libraries are for the public access not just those that can afford digital!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only 15% of the population read digital books and the majority using the library couldn&#8217;t afford E-readers &#8211; why even consider going digital? Libraries are for the public access not just those that can afford digital!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/12/21/guest-column-staying-relevant-%e2%80%94-why-the-library-must-change-and-embrace-the-digital-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4261</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=34950#comment-4261</guid>
		<description>What about insuring future compatibly for these electronic items? 

For example, a book can still be read (literally) hundreds of years after printing, while the hundred or so computer games the library added to its Children&#039;s collection a decade+ ago are now no longer compatible with current computer hardware (think Windows 3, DOS, and Mac OS v6/7 era software). Related: how many records, cassette tapes, and VHS formatted items are no longer in the library&#039;s collection after being purchased and circulated for years? 

As I understand things at the present time, the library is only paying for &quot;temporary digital versions&quot; of many of these items (essentially &quot;renting&quot; the materials) instead of buying permanent copies of them in &quot;future-proof&quot; digital formats-how will this situation determine the items actually -owned- by the library for circulating to its patrons? 

I think the library needs to address this matter publicly to assure us that they are being good stewards of our collection and library fees while finding a way to legally make a back-up of the physical digital media so that the investment in building a library of circulating materials does not go to waste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about insuring future compatibly for these electronic items? </p>
<p>For example, a book can still be read (literally) hundreds of years after printing, while the hundred or so computer games the library added to its Children&#8217;s collection a decade+ ago are now no longer compatible with current computer hardware (think Windows 3, DOS, and Mac OS v6/7 era software). Related: how many records, cassette tapes, and VHS formatted items are no longer in the library&#8217;s collection after being purchased and circulated for years? </p>
<p>As I understand things at the present time, the library is only paying for &#8220;temporary digital versions&#8221; of many of these items (essentially &#8220;renting&#8221; the materials) instead of buying permanent copies of them in &#8220;future-proof&#8221; digital formats-how will this situation determine the items actually -owned- by the library for circulating to its patrons? </p>
<p>I think the library needs to address this matter publicly to assure us that they are being good stewards of our collection and library fees while finding a way to legally make a back-up of the physical digital media so that the investment in building a library of circulating materials does not go to waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2011/12/21/guest-column-staying-relevant-%e2%80%94-why-the-library-must-change-and-embrace-the-digital-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4240</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=34950#comment-4240</guid>
		<description>The library has such short and inconvenient hours no wonder there is a decline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The library has such short and inconvenient hours no wonder there is a decline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
