<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Column: Rockford Public Library addresses weeding, collection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rockrivertimes.com/2012/04/25/guest-column-rockford-public-library-addresses-weeding-collection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2012/04/25/guest-column-rockford-public-library-addresses-weeding-collection/</link>
	<description>The Rock River Times - THE VOICE OF THE COMMUNITY SINCE 1993</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:10:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Collin</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2012/04/25/guest-column-rockford-public-library-addresses-weeding-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-5399</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=37248#comment-5399</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s observe some logic:  If something doesn&#039;t exist, it can hardly be considered a &quot;record&quot; now can it?  The haters are grasping at straws here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s observe some logic:  If something doesn&#8217;t exist, it can hardly be considered a &#8220;record&#8221; now can it?  The haters are grasping at straws here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2012/04/25/guest-column-rockford-public-library-addresses-weeding-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-5384</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=37248#comment-5384</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this will help.
(75 ILCS 70/1) (from Ch. 81, par. 1201) 
    Sec. 1. (a) The registration and circulation records of a library are confidential information. No person shall publish or make any information contained in such records available to the public unless:
        (1) required to do so under a court order; or
        (2) the information is requested by a sworn law 
Also, you are making assumptions about his library use. Not finding a record does not negate the confidentiality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this will help.<br />
(75 ILCS 70/1) (from Ch. 81, par. 1201)<br />
    Sec. 1. (a) The registration and circulation records of a library are confidential information. No person shall publish or make any information contained in such records available to the public unless:<br />
        (1) required to do so under a court order; or<br />
        (2) the information is requested by a sworn law<br />
Also, you are making assumptions about his library use. Not finding a record does not negate the confidentiality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2012/04/25/guest-column-rockford-public-library-addresses-weeding-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-5383</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=37248#comment-5383</guid>
		<description>To be clear. It is illegal to look at or for a person record unless they are trying to take out a book. It was an unnecessary look at the individuals status. Do not try to make this sound like it was an apporpriate activity. The only reason the attempt was made was to find out personal information about the individual not for his benefit. I hope that is clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear. It is illegal to look at or for a person record unless they are trying to take out a book. It was an unnecessary look at the individuals status. Do not try to make this sound like it was an apporpriate activity. The only reason the attempt was made was to find out personal information about the individual not for his benefit. I hope that is clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RPL</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2012/04/25/guest-column-rockford-public-library-addresses-weeding-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-5371</link>
		<dc:creator>RPL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=37248#comment-5371</guid>
		<description>To be clear, it is not illegal to determine whether or not someone is a library cardholder. The particular individual you reference had opinions about RPL collection and services, yet was not a taxpayer in the City of Rockford. However, given RPL&#039;s reciprocal arrangements with other area libraries, the individual might still be a user of the library (thus probably more educated about our programs and services). As it turned out, he was not a reciprocal borrower either, and therefore very unlikely to have firsthand knowledge of RPL from a user perspective. Under the freedom to read, we would not look at what the individual is reading or checking  out (nor do we save this information), but whether he is a cardholder is not protected information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, it is not illegal to determine whether or not someone is a library cardholder. The particular individual you reference had opinions about RPL collection and services, yet was not a taxpayer in the City of Rockford. However, given RPL&#8217;s reciprocal arrangements with other area libraries, the individual might still be a user of the library (thus probably more educated about our programs and services). As it turned out, he was not a reciprocal borrower either, and therefore very unlikely to have firsthand knowledge of RPL from a user perspective. Under the freedom to read, we would not look at what the individual is reading or checking  out (nor do we save this information), but whether he is a cardholder is not protected information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://rockrivertimes.com/2012/04/25/guest-column-rockford-public-library-addresses-weeding-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-5352</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockrivertimes.com/?p=37248#comment-5352</guid>
		<description>Emily:
Why was library staff going through library records to find information about someone who wrote a letter. That is what is disturbing. Have they been punished for their illegal behavior?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily:<br />
Why was library staff going through library records to find information about someone who wrote a letter. That is what is disturbing. Have they been punished for their illegal behavior?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
