- Guest Commentary: the Rockford Apartment Association
- State Roundup: NIU employee improperly reimbursed $30K
- State Roundup: Governor signs budget fix bills
- Rauner, Democratic leaders shake hands and make law
- State roundup: National guardsman and cousin arrested in terror plot
- Lawmaker says license plate readers a privacy threat
- Bryant not the first to feel impact of free agency rules
- State Roundup: Parents’ group calls for standardized test opt-out bill
- Hononegah Mack: ‘The best woman in the county’
- The tip of the iceberg: Human trafficking in America
U.S. Rep. Kinzinger, U.S. Sen. Warner request additional information regarding safety of F-22 Raptor
Online Staff Report
WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Sen. Mark R. Warner, D-Va., and U.S. Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., requested additional information May 11 from the U.S. Secretary of the Air Force to further determine the scope of safety concerns raised by several pilots of the USAF F-22 Raptor.
A joint letter to Air Force Secretary Michael B. Donley also recommends a comprehensive and confidential survey of F-22 pilots and USAF flight surgeons to determine the scope of oxygen-related, hypoxia-like symptoms and other health issues reported by F-22 pilots.
The letter followed a meeting in Sen. Warner’s office with Virginia Air National Guard Capt. Joshua Wilson and Maj. Jeremy Gordon, the two F-22 pilots who appeared on CBS’ 60 Minutes May 6 to discuss their concerns. The pilots are assigned to Langley Air Force Base in Hampton, Va., and since they went public on 60 Minutes, other pilots have contacted Sen. Warner with concerns.
“I have tremendous respect for the military service of Capt. Wilson and Maj. Gordon, and I admire their willingness to step forward under the Military Whistle Blower Act to voice their concerns about the safety of this aircraft,” Sen. Warner said. “The F-22 is a vital piece of the Air Force mission, and we must get better answers about these recurring medical issues experienced by our Raptor pilots and crews. The Air Force, scientists and the air crews themselves must work together to solve this problem, and we need to make sure there is a culture in which others feel safe coming forward.”
Rep. Kinzinger added: “Now is the time to press ahead and get the answers needed to these critical questions and requests in order to ensure the safety of the F-22 pilots and crews. I’m pleased to work with Sen. Warner in an effort to obtain a written response from the Air Force in order to determine the next step toward ultimately strengthening the F-22 program and protecting our military pilots and crews.”
In their letter, the senator and congressman ask for answers to a detailed set of specific questions, and recommend an immediate confidential safety survey to document the scope and frequency of hypoxia-like incidents involving the F-22. They also recommend establishment of a high-level task force involving the Navy, NASA and other qualified, independent researchers to help the Air Force identify and correct the issues involving the F-22.
“The safety of our pilots, the importance of their mission, and the safety and well-being of residents in our military communities are too important to do anything less,” the lawmakers wrote.
A text of the letter follows:
May 10, 2012
Michael B. Donley
Secretary of the Air Force
1690 Air Force Pentagon
Washington, DC 20330
Dear Secretary Donley:
We are writing to share our continued concerns for the health and safety of America’s F-22 Raptor pilots.
As you are aware, Captain Joshua Wilson and Major Jeremy Gordon recently met with both of us under protection by The Military Whistle Blower Act to express their concerns with the F-22 Raptor. The reports of hypoxia-like symptoms experienced by many F-22 pilots are deeply troubling, and we appreciate the attention to this issue that has been demonstrated to date by the Air Force.
After meeting with these pilots, and having conversations with many other knowledgeable individuals, we would recommend an immediate, confidential and anonymous safety survey of all active duty and reservist F-22 crews, pilots, and flight surgeons to definitively document the scope and frequency of these hypoxia-like incidents. It is our view that such a survey could be initiated within 10 days, and our offices would expect to receive timely updates both on the survey methodology and the results shortly thereafter.
As part of such a survey, the Air Force should clearly communicate to all F-22 pilots, maintenance crews, and flight surgeons that there will be no reprisals against anyone who comes forward with information. We suggest that you consider using a toll-free hotline to support anonymous dialogue, and consider broad outreach to maximize awareness of the availability of this hotline. Such a hotline should be staffed by trained individuals.
In addition, we urge you to consider establishing a high-level task force to work with the Department of Navy, the NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) and other qualified and independent research labs to identify the root causes of the F-22 safety issues and to explore potential solutions. The safety of our pilots, the importance of their mission, and the safety and well-being of residents in our military communities are too important to do anything less.
Additionally, we would appreciate your expeditious written responses to the following:
1. What were the results from any previous Air Force Culture Assessment Survey Tool (AFCAST) Safety Surveys provided to F-22 pilots or maintenance crews?
2. Has the Air Force initiated any other surveys, either formally or informally, in relation to hypoxia-like symptoms experienced by pilots or maintenance crews? If so, were these surveys completed?
3. Have any other pilots expressed to the Air Force their desire to not fly due to hypoxia-like symptoms? If so, how many?
4. Boeing presented two briefs to the Air Force regarding implementation of the M2A1 filter in the F-22 Raptor. Has Boeing asserted a claim against the release of such reports based on the disclosure of proprietary information? If not, when will the Air Force make those two briefings available?
5. Are you aware of any remaining pending disciplinary action against Capt. Joshua Wilson or Major Jeremy Gordon? If so, what is the justification for such disciplinary action?
6. It appears that the mitigation measures have been ineffective in preventing hypoxia-like incidents and the On-Board Oxygen Generating System (OBOGS) system may not be producing enough oxygen for pilots during their flights. What mitigation measures has the Air Force taken to increase the amount and quality of oxygen delivered to the pilots?
7. If it is true that the incidence of hypoxia among Air Force F-22 pilots is 18%, how does that compare historically to other types and models of aircraft? What level of hypoxic incidents does the Air Force consider acceptable?
8. What has testing shown about the potential liberation of charcoal and other ingredients from the C2A1 filter that may be blown through the system and into the pilot’s oxygen mask? Specifically, what concern do you have that particle sizes have been shown, in testing, to be liberated from the filter at a size in the three-micron range, and what level of concern do you have regarding the long term pulmonary and respiratory health of the pilots?
9. How many instances have there been of pilots or Air Force leadership at the squadron or wing level requesting a “stand down” due to concerns with the filter and other continued physiological incidents? What safety measures were added after each stand down to ensure the safety of the pilots?
10. What were the results of safety surveys administered by the wings at Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida and Elmendorf Air Force Base in Alaska? How many previously unreported incidents were identified as a result of those two surveys? How many maintainers have reported incidents during ground runs? Are these numbers included in the incident rate?
11. What is the Navy Experimental Dive Unit’s position on the F-22 OBOGS system? Do they believe the system delivers enough oxygen to the pilots, especially in high workload environments including high G maneuvering?
12. What metrics did the Air Force use when it returned the F-22 to flight status? What was the rationale for clearing the plane to fly, and what systems were repaired or modified to improve the air flow to pilots?
13. Are you aware of neurological symptoms reported by a large number of experienced F-22 pilots such as fatigue, headaches, persistent thirst, lack of coordination and coughing? If so, what is the Air Force’s aeromedical plan to deal with these issues?
As members of Congress, we both understand that the F-22 is a vital component of the Air Force mission for continued supremacy in air-to-air combat. Each of us wants to see these problems addressed immediately so that the F-22 can continue in that role.
Thank you for your timely cooperation and written response on these important matters.
Member of Congress
Eleventh District of Illinois
Posted May 11, 2012