Keepin’ it Kleen: Crime smothers economic recovery
By Michael Kleen
In a recent report on crime in Winnebago County, former Rockford Register Star Executive Editor Linda Grist Cunningham concluded that fears about Winnebago County crime are “more hype than fact.”
Given Rockford’s reputation for being somewhere between Mad Max and Grand Theft Auto, Cunningham’s conclusion may be superficially true. However, her assessment fails to acknowledge the profound impact both crime and the fear of crime have on society as a whole, particularly on the local economy.
In other words, crime is not merely an issue of criminal and victim, courts and judges, costs and savings. Crime and the economy are intimately connected, and a safe and prosperous community cannot be built without taking that connection seriously. Dismissing public perception as hype or irrelevant is not helpful.
It is no coincidence Winnebago County has been in the top five Illinois counties in terms of both crime and unemployment rates for more than a decade. Robberies, especially armed robberies, have a devastating effect on business. It is not just money taken during the robbery that is lost — the damage can be measured in terms of customers who stop visiting for fear they will be there at the wrong time, employees who are too scared to come back to work, and in difficulty in hiring new employees. As a result, a business that was already operating at the margins can be forced to close, lowering surrounding property values and adding to urban blight.
Almost every day in Rockford, there is a carjacking, armed robbery or assault. At the beginning of May, for example, a young woman working at the Burger King at the corner of Bell School Road and State Street was robbed at gunpoint while she was leaving work. That night alone, there were two more robberies in the city, including one at an ATM machine on Auburn Street. Another 22-year-old man was simply sitting in his car at an intersection when two men pointed handguns at him and demanded his money. One Subway Restaurant on East State Street has been robbed more than three times since December.
Incidents such as these create a climate of fear that stifles economic activity. Rockford is the third-largest city in Illinois, with a number of fine shops, bars and restaurants in our downtown. Why aren’t they overflowing with customers like those in smaller cities like Naperville, Schaumburg and Aurora? The answer is an ever-present anxiety — a conscious or unconscious decision made on the part of many area residents to evade danger by avoiding entire sections of the city, including any businesses that happen to be located there.
The City of Rockford has done little to address this issue and has occasionally managed to make things worse. Turning off more than 2,300 street lights last year to save money, for example, was a step in the wrong direction. Nothing makes people feel less safe than having to walk home (or to their car) in the dark.
In one flippant response to a resident who inquired about her now darkened street, a Public Works employee told her to rent a light from ComEd if she was concerned about safety in her neighborhood. The concerns of local residents need to be taken seriously, not dismissed.
Some, including the editors at the Register Star, have suggested Rockford is simply suffering from a negative attitude. Like the young orphan girl in the children’s novel Pollyanna, who transforms her aunt’s dispirited New England town into a pleasant place to live by looking at the bright side of every situation, these Rockfordians believe they, too, can transform reality by only looking at the positive, but it will take more than a Pollyanna-esque attitude to turn things around. Problems need to be acknowledged before they can be solved, and so far, wishful thinking has not brought about an economic recovery or reduced crime.
Concrete steps need to be taken to change the perception of public safety (or lack thereof) before any serious economic recovery can get under way. One simple thing the city can do is increase police foot patrols downtown and in high-crime areas. Police officers should be visible at major intersections and should be given responsibility for a square block or section of businesses. This would send a signal that public safety is a high priority, and business owners and their customers (as well as potential criminals) would know police are always within shouting distance. Anti-vagrancy and public decency laws should be vigorously enforced. Finally, Rockford needs a local concealed carry ordinance, so residents can defend themselves if attacked.
Together, these steps would greatly reduce crime and — more importantly — dramatically increase public perception of safety. Only then will the local economy truly begin to recover.
Michael Kleen is a local author, historian, and owner of Black Oak Media. He holds a master’s degree in history and master’s degree in education.
From the May 16-22, 2012, issue
Print This Article













6 Comments
Under reporting crime is a bigger problem than people realize. It is always in the politician’s interest to keep bad news from the public, lest they start to think the politicians shouldn’t be in office. A very concrete example of this just played itself out in Springfield with the death of House Bill 3914. HB3914 would have made a forced ATM withdrawal a distinct felony under the criminal code, thus allowing the police to track and more easily solve cases like the triple homicide of Natasha Cleary and her two small children. It also keeps the bankers happy because it keeps the extent of the problem out of sight and out of mind.
I’m not sure what the tone of the public works employee’s response regarding “to rent a light from ComEd” was, but yes, local residents can choose to create a local lighting district and essentially rent lights for their neighborhoods. That said, the city of Rockford’s decision to turn off all those lamps was short-sighted and will only complicate the crime issue.
Also, Aurora is substantially larger than Rockford, and Naperville a tad smaller. Both of which have a higher median income range than Rockford as they are largely commuter cities, residents taking advantage of the Metra train line to work in Chicago, and the better paying jobs in Chicago. Higher household earnings lead to more disposable incomes which can keep local business districts alive.
However your key thought that “crime and the economy are intimately connected” is accurate, please keep reminding folks of this.
I didn’t look at the most recent census numbers when I included Aurora in that list, but the point is still valid. According to the data, Rockford has a median household income of $55,667, vs. Aurora’s $54,861, although the per capita income in Aurora is higher, so I would say the two cities are comparable. The real difference is that crime in Aurora is at 30 year lows.
No, Rockford and Aurora aren’t that close. If you check the details, the median incomes for males and females are higher in Aurora, which means more people are working in each household in Rockford to achieve the same household median incomes. Rockford’s numbers of people living in poverty are higher. Aurora has a high number of new people in the region, the city is more widespread, and nearly three times as many people commute to their jobs outside their county than Rockford residents. So the earn, live and work differently. The biggest difference is Aurora’s median home price of almost $171,000, compared to Rockford’s $93,000. Since property taxes are the major source for police funding, Aurora simply has a larger tax base to pay for more police and fire services.
If your point is that Rockford is just too poor to have a thriving economy (along with a thriving downtown), I don’t buy it. On the far east side of the city, where I live, I see plenty of people at stores and restaurants both expensive and inexpensive. The Stone Eagle is almost always crowded. Now, why don’t all those people go downtown and mob great places like Octane, Chocolat By Daniel, or the Irish Rose? It isn’t because they can’t afford to go there, and it isn’t because those places lack good food.
Parking is the reason many people don’t eat downtown, and population growth is to the east, no mystery there. And we don’t have any “expensive” restaurants in Rockford, not compared to other communities.
Store fronts are vacant, occupancy is down even on E. State Street. My point is that we don’t have the same tax base as the other communities you referenced. That’s a fact. We simply don’t do enough to bring better paying jobs to the area. We need to focus on crime and education, then companies with better paying jobs might be willing to relocate here. Unfortunately, we need to create the jobs here, and can’t rely on residents traveling to good paying jobs, unlike the other communities you referenced.