Guest Column: Teachers’ unions share the blame for budget woes
By Rep. Jim Sacia
What a unique challenge the last 16 days of May! We eliminated a very costly free health care system for retirees. We did yeoman’s work in repairing an out-of-control Medicaid system. The work done on the budget by those of us on the five appropriations committees in the House to put together an acceptable budget that or once, spends no more than we anticipate as income was, simply put, amazing.
Pension reform remains, at best, a puzzle. In the waning hours before mandatory adjournment, midnight on May 31, no consensus could be reached.
Late at night on May 30, Speaker of the House Michael Madigan, in a brilliant political move, stated that the governor and House Republican Leader Tom Cross, R-Oswego had agreed that a cost shift should not occur. This shift would have placed a $26 billion cost for state pensions on the shoulders of suburban and downstate school systems, universities and community colleges rather than the state, was seen as a breakthrough.
Here is why it was brilliant — Speaker Madigan then transferred control of the bill to Cross. OK, so what? It had already been agreed that House Republicans would put 30 votes on the bill, and House Democrats would do the same. Once it became Cross’s bill, the Republicans remained committed, but Speaker Madigan could only produce 12 votes. He pulled his people off.
Now, the bill will languish for some time, perhaps until after the election in November. It’s much easier to take a hard vote right after an election than right before. Do you see Speaker Madigan’s strategy? The real icing on the cake is the governor has changed his mind and now wants the shift!!!
Since we’ve returned home from Springfield, I continue to look at hundreds of e-mails much like this one — “I am a teacher that votes. … Teachers did not cause this problem, past and present legislators are to blame.” No, not totally true!
In the 10 years I’ve been in the Legislature, three times we have either borrowed the money (on two occasions) or once omitted the state’s yearly payment (approximately $4 billion) to the pension fund. Each time the teachers’ unions (all) and the state employee unions (all) agreed to go neutral, meaning they did not object to the bill.
Why would they do that? Simple, they negotiated a perk, such as step increases for those soon to retire to enhance their retirement. Many rank-and-file union members angrily respond to me that it didn’t happen that way. Oh, yes, it did. Do you really believe bills of that magnitude would pass without unions’ backing anyway? Never happen!
As always, you can reach me, Sally or Barb at (815) 232-0774 or e-mail us at jimsacia@aeroinc.net. You can also visit my website at www.jimsacia.com. It’s always a pleasure to hear from you.
Jim Sacia (R) is the state representative for the 89th District in Illinois.
From the July 4-10, 2012, issue
Print This Article







3 Comments
This letter explains why we have so many problems in Springfield. Any one else not see any logic in his blaming unions? First the State admits not putting money in and the unions are supposed to say that is OK give us nothing and keep bashing us for things that we have no control over. There is nothing logical or that makes sense in this letter If this is an example of legislator thinking, we are in big trouble.
to my dear representive how does your logic apply to the state legislator pension program that is the most underfunded and has the biggest deficit of all the pension systems? and how is it that you merely have to serve a term and get a pension?
Typical politician’s spin, Mr. Sacia. The old ‘It’s not my fault.’ A politician’s spin attempting to place blame on unions & workers. Mr. Sacia: 1) YOU had the vote; 2) YOU had a choice; 3) YOU didn’t have to agree to any ‘deals’. Which way did you vote each of the 3 times you referenced? Where was YOUR voice then?