- Man pleads guilty but mentally ill in 2013 murder
- Telephone, computer network outages at 22 Rockford schools
- Byron native selected as Sailor of the Year for Navy Band Southwest
- Illinois Tollway awards $337 million in contracts, sets budget
- 44 earn bachelor’s degrees at Saint Anthony College of Nursing
- Goodwill opens Donation Express site on Perryville
- Rock Valley College to manage TechWorks program
- University of Illinois at Chicago names chancellor
- Salvation Army to distribute food, toys to nearly 2,000 families
- American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act signed into law
Pork industry facing financial disaster?
By Debra Levey Larson
Media/Communications Specialist, University of Illinois College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences
URBANA, Ill. — Drought and the impact on feed prices may be on the verge of creating a financial disaster for the pork industry and other livestock.
The crop stress that began in Indiana and Illinois is now spreading further to the west. Although much of the media attention has been focused on crop producers, who face large yield losses, the animal industries may ultimately fare even worse.
“Crop producers have the potential for two compensating income streams when yields are low,” said Purdue University Extension economist Chris Hurt. “The first is what is called the ‘natural hedge.’ When yields are low across a broad geographic area, then prices generally rise. This is especially true when stocks-to-use ratios are tight as they are now. Under these conditions, a 10 percent reduction in national yield is offset by a rise in prices that is substantially more than 10 percent. This means that revenues tend to be less negatively affected by yield losses. Many crop acres have some type of crop insurance that can help cushion the financial blow of low yields. While these conditions hold on average, there will be considerable ranges in how individual farm families are impacted.”
Hurt said pork and animal producers tend not to have any form of income protection against higher feed prices in the short run.
“With the weather market just three weeks, December 2012 corn futures have risen by $2.25 per bushel and December meal futures are up $100 per ton,” Hurt said. “These represent a 45 percent increase for corn and 28 percent increase for soybean meal. These higher feed prices have to be absorbed by the animal industry, causing a collapse in financial margins.”
Hurt said because higher feed costs cannot be passed on to the consumer, there is no natural hedge for the animal industries in the short run.
“The collapse of margins results in financial losses, which cause discouragement among animal producers,” Hurt said. “This will result in selling at lighter weights and the beginning of liquidation of some of the breeding herds and flocks immediately, but especially this fall.
“Unfortunately, the increased slaughter this summer and fall will tend to increase production and may cause some downward pressure on animal prices,” he added. “Over time, meat, milk and milk-product production drops and prices of animals and products rise such that the costs of higher-priced feed is passed to consumers. Animal producers ultimately do get compensation for the higher feed costs, but that comes after a prolonged period of losses that some producers cannot survive.”
How does this play out for the pork industry outlook today?
Hurt reported that December futures prices are $7.30 per bushel for corn and $450 per ton for meal. Estimated costs of pork production have reached record-high levels for the third quarter of this year, at $72 per hundredweight, and drop only to $69 for the fall and winter.
“Hog prices cannot reach those lofty costs with losses anticipated to be about $20 per head for the next three quarters,” Hurt said. “There is little hope to cover costs until feed prices move lower, which may be the fall of 2013. That is a long horizon of losses.”
Hurt said producers can be expected to respond by marketing animals more quickly, and this means at lower weights. In the last three weeks, the average live weight has dropped from 277 pounds to 274 pounds. Further reductions should be expected in the coming weeks.
Producers also will quickly look for low productivity sows to cull. The decision to liquidate sows will take a bit more time, but that could begin by the end of the summer and especially this fall.
Sows that go to market and are not re-bred in August will not have a litter in December and will not have market-ready hogs early next summer.
Hurt stressed that the important point is that hog prices for the last half of 2013 should begin to rise because of the quick beginning of liquidation this summer. This will likely be reflected in higher lean hog futures for the last half of 2013.
“The drought is on-going, and the impact on feed prices will be dynamic,” Hurt said. “For those hog producers who can survive the financial pressure over the next year, there can be improvement starting in the last half of 2013. Because hog prices should be higher by that point, short feed supplies will have been rationed out, and prospects for more normal 2013 yields will hopefully be in place.”
Hurt cautioned that those in the animal industry need to articulate the extreme financial stress they are likely to experience in the coming 12 to 15 months.
“The immediate view is that crop producers will bear the brunt of the financial losses, but losses in animal industries will be enormous over the next year, perhaps becoming considerably greater than for the crop sector,” Hurt said. “This articulation by the animal industries is important to alert consumers to higher retail food prices but also to policymakers. Policymakers will likely have an influence on release of CRP lands for grazing and haying, on any potential disaster payments from the federal government, and in helping the EPA/USDA make decisions about the size for the 2013 Renewable Fuels Standard.”
From the July 11-17, 2012, issue