Where’s the Tea Party now?
Twenty-two other states and John McCain recently joined Montana to defend its 1912 law against unfettered corporate campaign contributions, which had been passed because legislators were controlled by corporate money. In an extension of its 2010 Citizens United decision, the U.S. Supreme Court just went further to say that states cannot have laws that contradict it.
Besides the obvious perils of anonymous, unlimited, corporate money flooding American politics, there are two things here that really bother me. The first is that labor unions — even in their heyday — had only a fraction of the money of corporate America, and Republicans are out to eliminate them — as evidenced by the 10-1 spending in Wisconsin’s recall election, which was prompted by Gov. [Scott] Walker’s attempt to weaken and eventually kill the unions.
Second, the big-government-hating Tea Party is deafeningly silent about the Supreme Court’s obvious trampling on Montana’s (et al) state’s rights. They seem outraged by big government only when it suits them — like trumping up bogus fears over imaginary plans to take away their guns.
I doubt if we’ll hear a peep out of Robert Schilling, since he had already received $6,000 from the Koch brothers in January. But Cheri Bustos values the integrity of our votes. She has said she will fully support campaign finance reform. Let’s give her a chance to do that next November. This may be the signature issue of our time.
Caryn Unsicker
Silvis, Ill.
From the July 11-17, 2012, issue
Print This Article







5 Comments
The Tea Party is silent about the Supreme Court’s “obvious trampling on Montana’s state’s rights” because the Supreme Court didn’t trample on the State’s rights.
The Court maintained the Bill of Rights that Montana does not have the right to restrict free speech.
Also, I don’t exactly understand that you are bothered that corporate America has more money than labor unions. Why…?
If you want a ban on all Corporate donations you will mostly hurt your own Party which received millions and millions in Corporate donations.
The issue at hand really is the control of information. The left controls the information through a number of institutions and that control is where equalization needs to take place before this corporate control takes place.
The flow of information is controlled by the left through the Universities, High Schools, Grade Schools and Trade Schools which are all controlled by left wing Teacher’s Unions, Workers and government employees who all have a stake in controlling the information.
If you want a ban on Corporate influence you must first address this out of balance ability to control information which is what this is really all about.
The rest of the informational control is through the various media outlets. It is well know fact that most reporters are left wingers and though they claim objectivity we can see their bias in reality. Once the media polices itself and cleans up its house of lies then lets talk corporate donations which as said prior would hurt you party as much as any other political party. Receiving pennies from the Koch brothers compared to the millions from George Soros, the Tides Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Foundation and all the big foundations is where the left refuses to acknowledge their dominance.
Finally I would love for you to point out which Corporate donations you specifically object to while equally pointing out which Corporate Donations to your party you also object to.
I am bothered that unions and corporations can control our Government through “contributions”. As far as I am concerned,it is wrong that any entity other than registered voters can contribute to politicians. I have proposed (many times) that only voters should be allowed to contribute, and only to a maximum of $1,000 per candidate.
Our Government would operate as the founders intended were that the case.