Keepin’ it Kleen: An honest conversation about crime
By Michael Kleen
It is time for an honest conversation about crime in Rockford, a conversation that focuses on solutions rather than excuses.
For far too long, politicians and public officials have gotten away with blaming everything under the sun but themselves for their impotence in the face of the city’s problems. For years, they have offered the same solution: raise taxes and pour money into public schools and development projects, with little effect. We need leadership with the courage to change the conversation and get results.
Unfortunately, dissemblance has become a way of life for our public officials. In an interview last week, for example, Rockford Police Chief Chet Epperson masterfully side-stepped criticism over Rockford’s embarrassing crime rate. “There is too much crime,” he said. “When we look at crime reduction, crime is the end result. We have to look at poverty, the economy and education. Those are the core components. If we have a crime problem, that is the end. What has happened before that? We are making progress, but there is just too much crime.”
This is an incredible statement because, essentially, Chief Epperson is saying there is little the police department can do about crime in Rockford. The police department, after all, can do nothing about poverty, education or the economy. So, until “we” fix those things, there is only so much the police can do to keep crime in the city under control.
When the crime rate went down last year, however, Epperson was quick to take the credit. Now, when it is on its way back up, it is because of factors outside of his control.
The old scapegoats of poverty, poor education and the economy may be convenient, but they only go so far. Bernie Madoff and Kenneth Lay were wealthy and well-educated, but that did not stop them from committing their crimes. When a man from a working class or impoverished neighborhood steals a car, it is poverty’s fault. When Bernie Madoff steals more than $18 billion, whose fault is it?
The fact is that the overwhelming majority of Rockfordians are law-abiding citizens, even those who live in impoverished neighborhoods or who attended substandard schools. A person is not a ticking time bomb just because he or she grew up in a poor neighborhood. The idea that poverty and poor education are wholly to blame for criminal behavior is insulting to all those residents who simply want to walk down their street in safety. It is the job of the police department to deal with the small percent who make life miserable for everyone else.
There are always going to be some people who commit crimes because they are sociopaths and do not care about the consequences of their actions, but the majority of crimes are crimes of passion and opportunity. The more crimes people get away with, the more they will commit.
This destructive cycle is nurtured by a culture of tolerance for delinquency, a culture that is either reinforced or discouraged by signals sent from people in positions of authority. Inaction, hesitancy and refusal to accept responsibility are like green lights to those who already have little respect for the law.
Simple things like clearing trash, fixing streetlights, enforcing building codes, repairing streets, washing away graffiti and discouraging loiterers can have a dramatic effect on reducing crime in a neighborhood.
A university study called “The Spreading of Disorder,” published in the journal Science in 2008, found that when people observe others violate a certain social norm or legitimate rule, they are more likely to violate other norms or rules, which causes disorder to spread. Any veteran teacher skilled in keeping order in a classroom, of course, could have made that observation.
If the finger of blame for Rockford’s high crime rate must be pointed anywhere, it should be pointed at the criminals themselves as well as the policymakers who have virtually abandoned certain areas of the city. Safe streets and safe neighborhoods start with citizens who take an active role in their community, but law-abiding citizens need support and encouragement from their community leaders. They have the power to put weight behind their words.
The fact is, there are cities that had far worse crime rates than Rockford that were able to turn things around in just a few years. It will not be easy, but electing leadership that finally has the courage to confront the problem openly and honestly would be a good start.
Michael Kleen is a local author, historian, and owner of Black Oak Media. He holds a master’s degree in history and master’s degree in education. Read his previous columns online at makleen.com.
From the July 25-31, 2012, issue
Print This Article







7 Comments
So you’ve opened up a conversation on crime, and you’ve even mentioned some steps to take, “Simple things like clearing trash, fixing streetlights, enforcing building codes, repairing streets, washing away graffiti and discouraging loiterers can have a dramatic effect on reducing crime in a neighborhood.”
Next article, elaborate on those steps. What does the city do, the county, the residents?
I think you’re on the right track here, just as long as you too stay focused on the conversation. Use your articles to focus on specific problems narrowly. Pick off the problems one by one. Heck, pick a neighborhood, contact the neighbors and make a plan. Then implement the plan. Then you’d have something to write about and the city couldn’t ignore you.
These are good suggestions, and according to them Jesus Correa should be the rightful mayor of Rockford, because he’s the only person I know who organizes anything like neighborhood cleanups or shows of civic unity.
Not sure how to take Mr. Vaultonbur’s comments, but you don’t have to be bright, right, or have a track record of success to be an elected official, you just need to be more popular than your opposition. And today, money buys popularity.
All I can say is that Mr. Kleen begins to lay out the framework for one strategy to fight crime. But to be successful you have to go all in, stay focused on that one topic, not get distracted. Mr. Kleen makes some suggestions, so if wants to see them realized, he needs to take the lead.
If I had won my primary race back in March, I might be in a position to affect policy change. But alas, I am merely a humble writer. I will suggest that voters replace the current State’s Attorney in November, that would be a good start.
Quite frankly that’s a wimpy answer. We’re all in a position to affect public policy, you just need to work a little harder. Changing the State’s Attorney won’t change a thing. We need to pick up more criminals and prosecute them faster, and that’s more a function of the bottleneck in our court system. We need night court at least a couple night’s a week to help process the backlog.
I think you’re on the right track, too. My concern is with Eppersons attitude. A major cause of crime is drug trafficking. In fact, most of our crime is related one way or the other to drugs.
There is much the Police can do. they simply choose not to.
How about some undercover ops. to root out the black market firearms trade? Lets take illegal guns out of the hands of felons.
How about a real penal system? Forget that crap about rehabilitation, history proves it does not work! Apparently, once a criminal, always a criminal.
How about a job corp? Instead of wasting money on ridiculus river walks, or pouring money into a dieing downtown, lets give kids a job cleaning up…there is enough trash on our streets to keep them busy the rest of the summer.
First the past 6 years I have been on a soap box regarding the crime in Rockford. Weed & Seed? I don’t see any substantial change. Hug A Thug? What happened to that?
You do not need to be a Criminalogist to understand the common deanominator of Rockford’s Crime. #1 Guns. #2 Mobility.
The Rockford Police have no faith in support from their Command structure, so they are not going to push the envelope. I would start with a new Chief who throws his full support behind the field Officers. I would then direct them to stop every car they can with drivers (regardless of race) between the ages of 14 and 25. Push Pretext Stop to Reasonable Suspicion to Probably Cause to Searching the Vehicle, to arrest for licensing issues, weapons or dope,to Inventory Search to Impoundment. I would advertise our efforts and let everyone of Gang Banger age know that if you are driving dirty, our plan is to get to you before you get to your crime scene.