- Rauner, Democratic leaders shake hands and make law
- State roundup: National guardsman and cousin arrested in terror plot
- Lawmaker says license plate readers a privacy threat
- Bryant not the first to feel impact of free agency rules
- State Roundup: Parents’ group calls for standardized test opt-out bill
- Hononegah Mack: ‘The best woman in the county’
- The tip of the iceberg: Human trafficking in America
- State Roundup: House passes proposal to fill current fiscal year budget gap
- ‘Hogs streak hits 4 as race tightens
- Neighborhood feel key for Rural on Tap
Drought has large impact on cattle industry
By Debra Levey Larson
Media/Communications Specialist, University of Illinois College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences
URBANA, Ill. — The beef industry has already experienced a number of difficult years characterized by declining cow numbers and per capita beef supplies. There was hope in the first half of this year that this downward production phase was coming to an end, but the drought of 2012 has erased those hopes, according to Purdue University Extension economist Chris Hurt.
So, where is the cattle industry today, and what do we know about the impacts of this year’s drought?
The mid-year cattle inventory report from USDA indicated that beef cow numbers had dropped by an additional 3 percent over the past year. Since 2006, beef cow numbers have dropped by 8 percent, largely the result of higher feed prices and the long drought in the Southern Plains. The 2012 calf crop is expected to be down about 2 percent, and also down 8 percent from 2006.
Hurt said this year’s drought likely means further decreases in cow numbers over the next 12 to14 months.
“The impacts of the drought are just beginning to show up in some of the national data,” Hurt said. “We do know the direction, but not the final magnitude of those impacts. The cattle industry is negatively affected by feed costs and lack of availability of forages. Higher corn and soybean meal price have dropped the value of calves and feeder cattle that will eventually go to the feedlots. Lack of pasture is also causing some early movement of cattle.”
Since feed prices started rising in mid-June, corn prices have increased around 60 percent and soybean meal prices are up 25 percent, Hurt reported.
“Forage conditions have been horrible across the Midwest,” Hurt said. “At the end of July, pastures that were in ‘very-poor’ and ‘poor’ condition totaled from 82 percent to 98 percent for the states of Indiana, Illinois, Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska and Colorado (USDA:NASS).
“There have been many reports of producers forced to feed hay that was intended for this winter’s forage supply,” he said. “Those producers are hoping for late-summer rain that may restore some pasture this fall. If that does not come, a deeper liquidation of cows can be expected.”
Hurt reported that in the wake of high feed prices and uncertainty regarding forage availability, calf and feeder cattle prices plummeted. Oklahoma steer calf prices were $173 per hundredweight in mid-June and collapsed to $138 by late July. How much loss of value is that? A $35 per hundredweight decline on a 550-pound calf is nearly a $200 per head reduction in value. Multiplying that across a national calf crop of 34.5 million head totals a potential decline in value of more than $6 billion. Hurt said it is still too early to count the actual damages, but this illustration shows it is likely large.
Reduced value of calves and feed uncertainty will most likely result in further declines in cow numbers this fall and winter. National slaughter data so far during this drought indicate only modest increases in cow slaughter. However, most Midwest producers have had hay to feed helping them to avoid panic liquidation. How the drought unfolds in coming months will influence how much cow liquidation occurs. More rain and, thus, grass will reduce liquidation. Continued drought will increase fall and winter cow culling.
“The largest negative financial impacts of the drought will be felt by cow-calf producers and by feedlot managers who did not have feed prices locked in at the lower spring levels,” Hurt said. “Assuming most large feedlots are primarily hedged on feed and feeding margins, this means that moderate- and small-sized family feedlots are the primary category that suffered large losses. Some of those family farms may also have large losses from crops, especially if they did not have crop insurance, and thus could be in financial difficulty.”
Hurt said the message for cow-calf producers is to hold on to the cows, if possible.
“The short-term losses of the next 12 to14 months will be replaced by large profits in late-2013, 2014 and 2015,” Hurt said. “These anticipated ‘golden’ days are based on continued reductions in per capita beef supplies, which will mean higher and higher retail beef prices; on an expected return to more normal crops in 2013 and beyond; and record-high calf prices and profits in late 2013 and beyond. The problem for some producers in a weakened financial condition is that they have to survive the pain in the short run to secure the prize in the long run.”
Hurt said the message for family feedlot managers is “risk management.”
Any thoughts of industry-wide expansion are pushed off for another year to late 2013, when pastures are restored and feed prices drop, Hurt said. The exception is for producers in areas of the country that have abundant forages. For them, buying cows sold this fall from distressed owners appears to be a strategic move.
Posted Aug. 10, 2012