- Nov. 4 General Election endorsements: Retain County Clerk Margie Mullins
- Nov. 4 General Election endorsements: Re-elect Jesse White
- Nov. 4 General Election endorsements: Elect Sheila Simon as state comptroller
- Brad Roos to step down as Zion Development executive director
- Smash your pumpkin at Rockford’s Discovery Center Nov. 2
- Control the candy without limiting the Halloween fun
- RHS Ambassadors host Halloween party for hospitalized children
- Beware of the energy-sucking vampires in your home, ComEd warns
- Rockford Park District golf season begins to wrap up
- Two locals to be honored among state’s top college students
Pork industry faces record losses
By Debra Levey Larson
Media/Communications Specialist, University of Illinois College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences
URBANA, Ill. — A tsunami of red ink is about to wash across the pork industry, which is facing losses unseen even in the fall of 1998 when hog prices at times approached zero value.
According to a Purdue University Extension economist, the stressors include: more hogs than expected, rapid sow liquidation now under way, and record feed prices.
Losses in the final quarter of this year could be $60 per head, exceeding the previous record quarterly losses of $45 per head in the fall of 1998.
“Slaughter numbers in the past two weeks have been up 6 percent when only about 1 percent more hogs were expected,” said Chris Hurt. “This has caused a $10 per hundredweight drop in live prices since late July, with prices now in the low $60s.
“The source of those extra hogs is probably related to some delayed marketings due to the summer heat, to a desire to sell pigs more quickly before prices really tumble moving into fall, and to high-sow slaughter,” Hurt added. “Projected prices for the final quarter this year are in the mid-$50s, using current lean hog futures as a base. Tragically, costs of production are expected to be above $75 per live hundredweight for the remainder of the summer, this fall and winter.”
Hurt predicted losses per head this summer to be estimated at $30, followed this fall by record quarterly losses of $60 per head. Losses in the first and second quarters of 2013 are projected to be $38 and $5 per head, respectively. Over this one-year span, losses may average about $33 per head, meaning total losses of around $4 billion for the U.S. industry.
“There is strong evidence that the initial wave of breeding-herd reduction began in early August and has intensified,” Hurt said. “Sow-slaughter data show that around 30,000 sows were liquidated in the month of August alone. This would represent a reduction of about 0.6 percent of the national sow herd in one month. This rate will continue, and perhaps even increase, if corn prices stay at current levels or move higher. The breeding herd may decline by 4 to 6 percent in the six months from August 2012 through January 2013. The rate of liquidation is expected to slow sharply after this coming winter.”
Hurt described the dilemma for the industry to be the enormous losses for pigs that are already born. Continued liquidation of sows will not reduce slaughter numbers until next summer, and so does not address the short-term financial disaster.
“Short of euthanizing young pigs, reduction of weights can reduce total pork supplies, use less feed and enhance hog prices,” Hurt said. “The economics of reducing weights is largely related to packer-buying programs. Generally, it is not economical for producers to sell at lighter weights that receive a discount. Perhaps packers would consider lowering those threshold weights in this emergency. Producers should recognize that this could be costly to packers and to not expect one packer to do so unless all agreed.”
Hurt said President Barack Obama authorized the purchase of a modest amount of pork. “That volume is so small as to reduce the losses by less than $1 per head,” Hurt said. “Other demand stimulation could help increase pork prices, but the program would need to be much larger and more money would likely have to come from a Congress that has not had a strong record of agreement or accomplishment in recent months.”
There remains a small amount of hope that a partial waiver of the ethanol RFS for 2013 could reduce corn use for ethanol and lower corn prices. However, evaluations at the University of Illinois, Purdue and Iowa State all indicate that such a partial waver may have only small impacts on volume of corn used for ethanol.
“Financial losses of the magnitudes projected here will cause massive erosions of family equity and some bankruptcies,” Hurt said. “Unfortunately, losses in 2008 and 2009 were not fully recovered by the profits in 2010 and 2011 so that some producers face this tsunami in weakened financial condition.
“Family hog farms with a sizable land base will have land equity to draw on,” Hurt said. “Larger hog producers with a minimum land base will need to draw on corporate equity and then their lenders. Lenders will make the final decisions for the weakest, but will strive to keep companies in operation as they seek new buyers. This means that another round of consolidation of ownership can be anticipated.”
Hurt concluded by saying that unfortunately individual producers are going to need to find their own way through the short-term carnage.
Hurt said, “The irony is that hog production may return to profitability by mid-summer 2013 when meal prices begin to moderate, hog prices move to record highs, and rain and reasonable temperatures bless our nation’s corn and soybean fields once again.”
From the Aug. 29-Sept. 4, 2012, issue