Comments on: Guest Column: I’ll show Romney mine if he’ll show me his — tax returns, that is

By: nobama4me

nobama4me — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:33:45 +0000

Obummer has obviously had the IRS probe Romney’s taxes and can’t find anything wrong, so he has no reason to release any more years. Why are people jealous of success and always want to take someone’s wealth?

By: Dan

Dan — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:13:51 +0000

This is hilarious. Bob Adams is committing liable here. Substitute REAL Birth Certificate for Tax Return and turn it around. Obviously, Obama is hiding something, as well. He may very well have been and probably was born in HI. But why postpone showing a BC and then after submitting 2 that don’t even concur. The one he’s so proud of as to put on the WH website is a fake. No regular scan of a document produces the results like this PDF. The forger forgot to “flatten” the image before calling it “good enough to fool most morons.”

By: Bob Adams

Bob Adams — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:07:59 +0000

No body is bitter about a guy making a lot of money unless that guy is running for President and a tax criminal like Rommey. His reasons for not showing his tax returns have nothing to do with what Romney or his wife said. His taxes would show that he’s a tax criminal that took an amnesty deal for swiss bank accounts, that’s why he won’t show his returns. The American people are not stupid, if Romney didn’t have something real bad hiding in those tax returns he would have been released them. He will never release them and we know the real reason why.

By: Jared

Jared — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:41:41 +0000

Not a great headline. Is this somehow supposed to entice Romney into showing his…?? You say that it is wrong, wrong, wrong when the working guy pays higher taxes earned from the sweat of his brow. Do you imply that blue-collar / more physical work should get higher income than working smarter (rather than based on which work brings in more money)? Would you prefer if the rich no longer invested in businesses…? You seem bitter about those that ‘win the game’ under the rules defined long ago, and that not only the rules should be changed for the future, but that those who have succeeded in the past should be set-back.