- Lee Hamilton: November’s elections won’t resolve much of anything
- Pec Playhouse Theatre announces auditions for holiday production
- Keeping up with Aida: A western adventure, part three
- State prepares for thousands of medical marijuana applications
- Rockford’s Choices Natural Market celebrates Non-GMO Month
- Week 5 NFL picks: Lions to improve to 4-1, Packers and Bears will keep pace at 3-2
- Craft Beer Scene Around Rockford: Revolution Brewing’s Oktoberfest offers good all-around balance
- Rockford’s Fall ArtScene at 37 locations Oct. 3-4
- Tales from the Trough: Preseason interview with ‘The Voice of the IceHogs,’ Mike Peck
- Mr. Green Car: Saltwater-powered car: the Quant e-Sportlimousine
Tax cuts should be extended
Every time in our nation’s history that an across-the-board tax cut has been implemented, the economy has greatly improved with more jobs for citizens and more money for the federal government, since we now have more people working and paying taxes with less taking tax money.
Newt Gingrich should receive the credit Bill Clinton gets for a healthy economy in the ’90s. Clinton knew he would have a tough time getting re-elected if he didn’t sign Gingrich’s tax cut bill.
President Obama doesn’t seem to understand this principle, and it seems he will increase taxes on the middle class if the Bush cuts are also applied to the rich. He states he will not sign such an extension.
Tax increases on the rich is so negative and pure demagoguery. There are many more votes to increase these taxes (even if it really damages our economy) than votes to, for instance, extend the Bush tax cuts intact. So, it seems another example of Democrats playing politics for more votes.
Michael A. Smith
From the Oct. 24-30, 2012, issue