Agitate, America!: ‘Big Money’ loses election
By Nancy Churchill
A Progressive Visionary
Who knew that an America election could degenerate into an endurance contest? That non-violent resistance could be as simple as courageously standing in line for hours just to cast a ballot? That voting could turn many thousands of ordinary Americans into heroes?
This past presidential election was a game-changer. Much more than just a win for Democrats, it was the people’s repudiation of Big Money’s influence in our elections. This election day, the people won, Big Money lost.
Nothing was more satisfying than the looks of disbelief on the faces of conservative operatives as they watched their takeover plans slip away. I was reminded of the stupid dog who’d tried to convince the cat there was food in the alley, only to discover his fabrication had convinced only himself.
But beware, Big Money’s shenanigans planned for the lame-duck Congress!
Katherine McFate of OMB Watch warns that senators are fast-tracking the Independent Agency Regulatory Analysis Act of 2012 (S. 3468). It would strip independent federal agencies of much of their independence, require expensive and unnessary cost-benefit analyses, and hand over to the White House the congressional control that’s currently in place.
These requirements would significantly curtail the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) ability to protect investors from financial fraud, for example, by delaying implementing of the financial oversight of the Dodd-Frank law. Yet, the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC), with chairman U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), may mark up this bill during the upcoming lame-duck session, even though no hearings have been held on the bill.
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., cautions that Congress, egged on by Wall Street and corporate America, are planning to ram a deficit reduction plan through a lame-duck Congress, aimed at cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, while lowering tax rates for the wealthy and large corporations.
Meanwhile, U.S. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, urges the passage of the 21st Century Trade Agreements Act now, before negotiators from 11 nations and 600 corporate “advisers,” scrambling behind closed doors, conclude the corporate-coup-by-trade-agreement known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The Trade Agreements Act would stop trade pacts that offshore U.S. jobs and flood us with unsafe imports, and would open up the negotiating process for the public and congressional oversight.
The power of Big Money runs deep. Heroically standing in line to vote won’t be enough to stop a hostile takeover of our democracy. Get involved during this lame-duck session of Congress. Tell both your U.S. senators to oppose the Independent Agency Regulatory Analysis Act, S. 3468, and pass the 21st Century Trade Agreements Act. Tell your representative to oppose cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid to lower tax rates for the wealthy. They’ll surrender to Big Money, unless we stop them.
Visit United Republic (http://act.unitedrepublic.org/event/cosponsor/3865) to get the money out of politics, and Move To Amend (https://movetoamend.org/) to end corporate rule. Democracy needs participation to survive!
Highlights of Nancy Churchill’s life are growing up in Congo, Africa, until she was 15, racing stock cars as an adult from 1976 until 2001, and writing as a liberal political junkie since the early ’90s. She lives in Oregon, Ill.
From the Nov. 21-27, 2012, issue
Print This Article







5 Comments
As a Republican, I wish I could get some of this “big money.” Where is it and how can I apply? President Obama raised $632,177,423, to Romney’s $389,088,268. It seems like the big money backed the winner in this election.
Ms.Nancy Churchill
A Progressive Visionary ” Don’t there is such a thing as “A Progressive Visionary”.
But there is a “Communist Visionary”. I expect that with knowledge ad expertise that you probably read the NYT and I expect that you don’t think too many people in Rockford read the NY Times. Please read NYT “Election. NYTimes.com2012/campaign-finance.
Then you can apologize to the Rockford people and anyone else that reads the RRT.
obama raise 934.0 million and spent 852.9m
Romney raised 881.8 m and spent 752.3m.
Please explain to me “Who Had The Big Money”?
The “people’s” money never counts in elections. Don’t you guys get that, Comrades?
Consider the source. Living in the Congo until 15 as a socialist, racing cars a an adult is a rich man’s sport, so she had money to run with the men. As a liberal commentator as well, she can’t be listened to with any expectation of knowledge of Republicans and their big money.
The big money talkers are elites themselves.
Now I have no problem with having money, that IS our GOD, by the way! I just like to point out the stupidity that is spewed when Romey’s money is any different from Chuck Schumer’s or Nancy Pelsi’s money and how they spend it.
The big boys have pwned you and you don’t even know it. The “Millionaires tax” will mainly fall on small business. You know – the place where most jobs are created.
Of course it is no problem for the big boys. In fact it helps stifle competition. A very good thing for them.
The US should be doing as much as it can to attract millionaires. Suppose they all lived in America? Wouldn’t Americans be better off?
There are two ways out of our current fiscal problem:
Grow American business quickly
Cut entitlement spending.
Which would you prefer? Work towards it. If it is growth – unhobble business. Because supporting government spending will require a business sector 2X as large as it is now in very short order.
Of course there is the option of doing nothing. Then when resources run out (goods and services) those living on the dole will be out of luck in any case.
And reducing the DoD? You might want to look into the history of the 1930s to see the last time it was tried. For results you can study from May of 1940 to August 1945. A lovely era in history. If piles of dead bodies and ruined cities and countries are your thing.