Wind power is least damaging of energy technologies

December 12, 2012

There are so many things wrong with the op-ed “Fight Big Wind Now!” (Dec. 5-11 issue) that it’s difficult to begin, but I’ll try.

For one, the opening paragraph states, “damage to the web of life” — yet wind power is the LEAST damaging of current technologies, only possible positive exceptions being direct and passive solar! Nationwide, natural gas production peaked years ago, so it increasingly requires “fracking” to harvest, which is horrendously detrimental to water tables, human beings and the environment. Oil production, even more so, and that’s before it’s burned in your vehicle and put back into the air — and don’t get me started on coal-burning power plants or oil from tar sands, both of which are complete environmental disasters (for example, in Illinois alone, 1,500 pounds of toxic mercury are released yearly into the air, lakes, streams and land via coal-burning power plants).

For “conventional technologies,” that leaves us only one: Nuclear. But, sorry, conventional nuclear is SO detrimental and dangerous that much of its cost is due to the fact that utilities must provide their own capital budgets and insurance underwriting — why? Because NO ONE ON WALL STREET would ever touch such a risky investment, and has not to date, so don’t expect them to in the future — it will be ratepayers footing the entire bill.

That leaves the energy field wide open for, among others, the following “green” (relatively speaking) technologies: Wind. Solar. Hydrogen. Fusion (not “fission”!). Wave. Geothermal.

I have an idea: Let’s END all state and federal subsidies for the polluting, disease-producing, literally planet-killing coal, gas and oil industries — that should save U.S. taxpayers between $5 and $15 billion per year, adjusted. That would be a start.

Tim O’Donnell
Rockford

From the Dec. 12-18, 2012, issue

One Comment

  1. James C. Davis

    January 21, 2013 at 11:32 am

    Tim
    Your quote “Let’s END all state and federal subsidies for the polluting, disease-producing, literally planet-killing coal, gas and oil industries”
    You will have to wait until the sun came up in the morning & go to bed when the sun goes down. You will freeze in the winter & burn up in the summer. Of course there would not be a reason to get up because there wouldn’t be any jobs to go to. No gas to run your car. No refrigeration to keep your food. There would be no food, what do you think the tractors run on to grow your food. Peta wouldn’t let you use horses or oxen to farm the field. The creeks and rivers are all polluted and there wouldn’t be any electricity to pump water.
    JUST HOW LONG WOULD YOU LIVE IF THERE WAS NO OIL, GAS & COAL.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>