Alice Saudargas removed from April ballot
Staff Report
A three-member Education Electoral Board voted unanimously Tuesday afternoon, Jan. 15, to remove the name of Alice Saudargas from the April ballot for the Rockford Board of Education in Subdistrict C.
The board ruled 28 of the signatures on Saudargas’ petitions were invalid, leaving her with only 41 valid signatures. That number was short of the 50 valid petition signatures required for candidates under the Illinois School Code.
In removing Saudargas from the ballot, the board sustained objections filed by Julie Pick.
Under Illinois law, a candidate’s petitions can be challenged on grounds the signatures are invalid, were improperly gathered or other information on the petitions is incorrect. In the case of Saudargas’ petitions, the signatures did not include addresses, were not legible, were not qualified voters or voters in Subdistrict C. Neither Saudargas nor a legal representative appeared at the hearing, which was in the third floor board boom of the Administration Building and was open to the public. The electoral board issued its ruling in open session after discussing the matter in closed session.
The electoral panel consisted of Harmon Mitchell as Rockford Board of Education president, Tim Rollins as board member and community member Paul Logli.
Saudargas, 96, was challenging incumbent board member Kenneth J. Scrivano, who represents Subdistrict C. He is now unopposed on the ballot. Seats in all seven subdistricts are up for election April 9.
Posted Jan. 15, 2013
Print This Article












One Comment
I hope there’s some follow up to this story. The tv news reported that Ms. Saudargas actually had enough affidavits to give her the 50 required signatures. I would like to know if that’s true. If she’s fighting this hard, then there must be some validity to it. I want to know if Ken Scrivanos campaign people are being dishonest or manipulating the system so they don’t have to do any work to be elected. It also sounds like Swedish American Hospital is involved. The candidate and the objector are Swedish American employees and now I have heard that the attorney also represents Swedish American Hospital. What on earth is actually going on? Do we have a hospital doing dirty work behind the scenes? I’m disgusted by this whole thing.