- Oregon mayor reacts to Exelon talk of closing nuclear plant
- GiGi’s benefit for Down syndrome, March 21
- What’s the future hold for Rose?
- ‘Hogs keep pace in tight Midwest
- Qatar continues to confound
- Meet John Doe: Keep public notices in print
- Commentary: Rauner’s minimum wage plan just more of the same from GOP
- Tube Talk: A bite out of the competition
- Rockford Rocked: A chat with local musician Tony Walker
- Drafts & Fare: Women brewers find more recognition in market
Congressional term limits bill introduced
Bill calls for limit of three terms for representatives, two terms for senators
FAIRFAX, Va. — U.S. Rep. Matt Salmon, R-Ariz., introduced an amendment to the U.S. Constitution April 25 that would limit the number of terms a member of Congress may serve to three in the House of Representatives and two in the Senate.
Term limits for members of Congress have been spotlighted in recent weeks as former senator and vice presidential nominee Joe Lieberman announced that after reflection on his 24 years in office, he now supports term limits.
The Lieberman statement was followed by a poll conducted by the Gallup organization that showed the American people would vote for congressional term limits by a 75 percent to 21 percent margin.
Phil Blumel, president of U.S. Term Limits, the nation’s largest term limits advocacy group, called on Congress to send the Constitutional Amendment to the states for them to decide, saying: “The public clearly wants term limits, and it is the ultimate conflict of interest for federal elected officials to prevent the states from making the decision on whether their own terms should be limited.”
Salmon is introducing the amendment on a tide of public dissatisfaction with Congress, and Blumel believes this public outcry may break the log jam that has prevented consideration, stating: “Many members of Congress are hearing from their constituents that they want the tough issues in D.C. to be acted upon rather than a continual kicking of the can down the road. In this context, they are realizing that a constitutional amendment limiting terms for members of Congress may be the only way to make our political system work again.
“Now, Congress faces a crisis,” Salmon said. “The people hold the legislative branch of our federal government in such low regard largely because they believe that they are no longer represented by fellow citizens, but instead by professional politicians. It is time to change this. It is time to put citizens back in charge. It is time to pass congressional term limits.”
U.S. Sen. David Vitter, R-La., has introduced the same congressional term limits amendment in the U.S. Senate.
To become part of the U.S. Constitution, the amendment requires a two-thirds vote in each house of Congress and ratification by three quarters — or 38 out of 50 — states.
From the May 1-7, 2013, issue