- Keeping up with Aida: A western adventure, part three
- State prepares for thousands of medical marijuana applications
- Rockford’s Choices Natural Market celebrates Non-GMO Month
- Week 5 NFL picks: Lions to improve to 4-1, Packers and Bears will keep pace at 3-2
- Craft Beer Scene Around Rockford: Revolution Brewing’s Oktoberfest offers good all-around balance
- Rockford’s Fall ArtScene at 37 locations Oct. 3-4
- Tales from the Trough: Preseason interview with ‘The Voice of the IceHogs,’ Mike Peck
- Mr. Green Car: Saltwater-powered car: the Quant e-Sportlimousine
- Charges re-filed against seven Hells Angels
- Tube Talk: Addicted to ‘Rehab Addict’
Military policy on weapons explained
In response to Tim Hughes and John Kight (gun law enforcement debate), military personnel are not allowed to carry weapons “in garrison” on military bases. I know, because I spent 11 years at Fort Drum, N.Y., and even had a New York State concealed carry permit. This prohibition was imposed by President Bill Clinton in 1993.
Since I lived on Post, I was required to register my firearms. The issue at hand is, should troops be required to register their weapons if they live off base. Using Fort Hood as an example, are you really suggesting that the jihadist who lived off-Post, had legally purchased his firearms, would not have jumped up and yelled “allahu akbar” and begun his suicide mission if his guns were registered? I cannot imagine the fantasy world someone must live in to believe that.
If you recall, it was two civilian police officers who stopped the murder, since the Department of Defense has contracted out most base security. The number killed was 14.
So-called “gun-free” zones are mass murder magnets.
I also share Mr. Kight’s anger that we are still unwilling to do what is necessary to stop the next inevitable school shooting. What will be our excuse then?
William J. Lee
From the July 31-Aug. 6, 2013, issue