- Dimke: ‘I’m not going to retire’
- IMRF responds: Pay spiking against the rules
- Bill limits automated license plate readers
- Private uni’s subject to FOIA says House
- Guest Commentary: Earth Day or April Fools Day?
- State Roundup: Concerns raised about proposed change in DUI pot standard
- Bill would decrease pot penalties; small amounts would draw only ticket, fine
- Senate votes to restore human service cuts; bill moves to House for consideration
- Bill to restrict red light cameras passes House
- State Roundup: Budget fix in current FY not yet done
U.S. Court of Appeals to hear case on vehicle rear visibility standard
Online Staff Report
NEW YORK — Public Citizen will argue Tuesday, April 1, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York on behalf of safety advocates who have sued the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), challenging DOT’s failure to issue an auto safety rule mandated by Congress in 2008.
The rule, which would set a federal safety standard for vehicle rear visibility, would prevent crashes in which a vehicle moving backward strikes a person behind the vehicle.
According to DOT, such crashes kill more than 200 people each year, almost half of them children younger than 5, and injure 14,000.
Congress mandated that DOT issue the rule by 2011, and DOT proposed a rule in 2010. The Barack Obama administration, however, has repeatedly delayed the rule, which it now says will be delayed until 2015.
DOT estimated the rule it proposed in 2010 — but failed to finalize — would prevent 95 to 112 deaths and 7,072 to 8,374 injuries each year.
Safety advocates and two parents who unintentionally hit their children when backing up sued DOT Sept. 25, 2013; the petitioners are represented by Public Citizen.
Dec. 20, 2013, DOT told the court its delay was justified because it needed more time for analysis. Yet, just five days later, the agency submitted a new draft final rule to the White House for review. Three months later, the rule has not been issued.
DOT previously sent the White House a draft final rule in 2011; the rule languished without action for 19 months and was then withdrawn, prompting the current lawsuit.
The petitioners are: Dr. Greg Gulbransen, Susan Auriemma, Consumers Union of United States, Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, and Kids And Cars, Inc.
Auriemma, of Manhasset, N.Y., backed over her 3-year-old daughter Kate in her driveway in 2005, injuring her. Gulbransen, of Syosset, N.Y., backed over his 2-year-old son Cameron in his driveway in 2002, killing him. The 2008 law is named after Cameron.
Posted March 28, 2014