- Conservatives join New Hampshire rally in support of campaign finance reform
- 11 public housing residents complete job readiness training
- Youth health care enrollment event at NIU Rockford Jan. 29
- More than 50 employers at Jan. 29 job fair
- School district’s credit rating remains solid
- State Police seize LSD, cannabis, U.S. currency in I-80 arrest
- Park District names employee, team of the year
- A closer look at fracking for natural gas
- Susan Johnson, copy editor, moves on after 21 years
- Guest Column: Clean Water Act: Supporters of clean water must make their voices heard
To the Editor: Clearing the regulatory waters
After a decade of uncertainty over Clean Water Act jurisdiction following Supreme Court challenges in 2001 and 2006, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers announced a forthcoming administrative rule to close enforcement loopholes, restoring protections to 20 million acres of wetlands, more than half the nation’s streams, and drinking water for 117 million Americans.
Rural America — and the family farmers, ranchers and small towns therein — are the tip of the spear in protecting America’s water quality. The proposed rule is a commonsense effort to clear the regulatory waters, protect the nation’s surface waters, and provide an environment in which economically vital activities such as hunting, fishing and birding as well as farming and ranching can thrive.
The EPA has an opportunity to ensure that the rule will provide greater opportunities for farmers and ranchers to partner with USDA’s Natural Resource Conservation Service programs to enhance water quality through increased water retention and reduced runoff with buffer strips, cover crops and other sustainable farming practices. And the rule can help reduce some of the economic burden currently faced by many small towns in improving drinking water quality.
Once the rule is published in the Federal Register, individuals and organizations will have 90 days to offer comments on ways the rule can be improved. Although the new rule is an encouraging first step in providing clarity and a better regulatory framework for protecting surface water quality across the nation, no rule is perfect.
Media Director, Center for Rural Affairs
From the April 23-29, 2014 issue