- Dimke: ‘I’m not going to retire’
- IMRF responds: Pay spiking against the rules
- Bill limits automated license plate readers
- Private uni’s subject to FOIA says House
- Guest Commentary: Earth Day or April Fools Day?
- State Roundup: Concerns raised about proposed change in DUI pot standard
- Bill would decrease pot penalties; small amounts would draw only ticket, fine
- Senate votes to restore human service cuts; bill moves to House for consideration
- Bill to restrict red light cameras passes House
- State Roundup: Budget fix in current FY not yet done
Public input not wanted at library board meetings
The library board shouldn’t be surprised no one showed up for the public input session of its July 28 meeting.
Over the years, the board has sent numerous nonverbal messages that public input is not welcomed. At a recent meeting, for example, board President Paul Logli made a gleeful gesture upon learning no one had signed up to speak. That sort of thing is not lost on those who witness it.
With a background in speech communication that gives me an awareness when listeners are not listening, I was well aware of this problem when I and other speakers in the past have expressed concern over certain issues facing the library board. One can’t help get the impression the board just isn’t listening; that it’s a perfunctory duty they have to endure, a drudgery, to be done with as quickly as possible.
That’s why I resorted to writing guest columns about various library issues to force the board to address those concerns and do something about them.
From the Aug. 13-19, 2014, issue